Author:
Koyama Hajime,Kashio Akinori,Yamasoba Tatsuya
Abstract
Objective
This study aimed to evaluate the differences in electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) thresholds and postoperative mapping current (T) levels between electrode types after cochlear implantation, the correlation between ECAP thresholds and T levels, and the performance of machine learning techniques in predicting postoperative T levels.
Study Design
Retrospective case review.
Setting
Tertiary hospital.
Patients
We reviewed the charts of 124 ears of children with severe-to-profound hearing loss who had undergone cochlear implantation.
Interventions
We compared ECAP thresholds and T levels from different electrodes, calculated correlations between ECAP thresholds and T levels, and created five prediction models of T levels at switch-on and 6 months after surgery.
Main Outcome Measures
The accuracy of prediction in postoperative mapping current (T) levels.
Results
The ECAP thresholds of the slim modiolar electrodes were significantly lower than those of the straight electrodes on the apical side. However, there was no significant difference in the neural response telemetry thresholds between the two electrodes on the basal side. Lasso regression achieved the most accurate prediction of T levels at switch-on, and the random forest algorithm achieved the most accurate prediction of T levels 6 months after surgery in this dataset.
Conclusion
Machine learning techniques could be useful for accurately predicting postoperative T levels after cochlear implantation in children.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Reference37 articles.
1. Use of electrically evoked compound action potentials for cochlear implant fitting: A systematic review;Ear Hear,2018
2. Optimizing fitting in children using objective measures such as neural response imaging and electrically evoked stapedius reflex threshold;Otol Neurotol,2007
3. A different approach to using neural response telemetry for automated cochlear implant processor programming;Ear Hear,2005
4. The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the nucleus 24 speech processor: Data from adults;Ear Hear,2000
5. Comparison of EAP thresholds with MAP levels in the nucleus 24 cochlear implant: Data from children;Ear Hear,2000