An External Validation Study for Automated Segmentation of Vestibular Schwannoma

Author:

Suresh Krish1,Luo Guibo2,Bartholomew Ryan A.1,Brown Alyssa1,Juliano Amy F.3,Lee Daniel J.1,Welling D. Bradley1,Cai Wenli2,Crowson Matthew G.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

2. Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts

3. Department of Radiology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

Abstract

Objective To validate how an automated model for vestibular schwannoma (VS) segmentation developed on an external homogeneous dataset performs when applied to internal heterogeneous data. Patients The external dataset comprised 242 patients with previously untreated, sporadic unilateral VS undergoing Gamma Knife radiosurgery, with homogeneous magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. The internal dataset comprised 10 patients from our institution, with heterogeneous MRI scans. Interventions An automated VS segmentation model was developed on the external dataset. The model was tested on the internal dataset. Main Outcome Measure Dice score, which measures agreement between ground truth and predicted segmentations. Results When applied to the internal patient scans, the automated model achieved a mean Dice score of 61% across all 10 images. There were three tumors that were not detected. These tumors were 0.01 ml on average (SD = 0.00 ml). The mean Dice score for the seven tumors that were detected was 87% (SD = 14%). There was one outlier with Dice of 55%—on further review of this scan, it was discovered that hyperintense petrous bone had been included in the tumor segmentation. Conclusions We show that an automated segmentation model developed using a restrictive set of siloed institutional data can be successfully adapted for data from different imaging systems and patient populations. This is an important step toward the validation of automated VS segmentation. However, there are significant shortcomings that likely reflect limitations of the data used to train the model. Further validation is needed to make automated segmentation for VS generalizable.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3