Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes in Cystic Versus Solid Vestibular Schwannoma in a Multi-institutional Cohort

Author:

Zhang Lisa1,Ostrander Benjamin T.2,Duhon Bailey1,Moshitaghi Omid2,Lee Joshua2,Harris Micah3,Hardesty Douglas A.4,Prevedello Daniel M.4,Schwartz Marc S.5,Dodson Edward E.1,Friedman Rick A.2,Adunka Oliver F.1,Ren Yin1

Affiliation:

1. Division of Otology, Neurotology and Cranial Base Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio

2. Division of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California

3. Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh

4. Department of Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio

5. Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California

Abstract

Objective Cystic vestibular schwannomas (cVSs) have more variable and less favorable clinical outcomes after microsurgical resection compared with solid VS (sVS). This study compares the preoperative presentation and postoperative outcomes between cVS and sVS. Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Two tertiary skull base referral centers. Methods Consecutive adult patients who underwent VS resection from 2016 to 2021 were included. Univariate and multivariate analyses compared differences in baseline symptoms and postoperative outcomes between cVS and sVS. Results There were a total of 315 patients (64% female; mean age, 54 yrs) and 46 (15%) were cystic. cVS were significantly larger than sVS (maximum diameter, 28 vs. 18 mm, p < 0.001) and had higher rates of dysphagia and dysphonia preoperatively (p < 0.02). cVSs were more likely to undergo translabyrinthine resection (76 vs. 50%, p = 0.001) and have a higher rate of subtotal resection (STR) compared with sVS (30 vs. 13%, p = 0.003). At latest follow-up, fewer cVS achieved good facial nerve (FN) outcome (House-Brackmann [HB] I/II) (80 vs. 90%, p = 0.048). Subanalysis of cVS and sVS matched in tumor size, and surgical approach did not show differences in the rate of STR or FN outcomes (HB I/II, 82 vs. 78%, p = 0.79). Conclusion In this large multi-institutional series, cVSs represent a distinct entity and are characterized by larger tumor size and higher incidence of atypical symptoms. Although cVSs were more likely to undergo STR and portend worse FN outcomes than sVSs, this may be due to their larger tumor size rather than the presence of the cystic component.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Sensory Systems,Otorhinolaryngology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3