Clinical Report: Clinician Feedback on the Magnetic Levator Prosthesis

Author:

Houston Kevin E.,Nadeau Melanie,Paschalis Eleftherios I.

Abstract

ABSTRACT SIGNIFICANCE Stakeholder engagement has been identified by national health organizations as a crucial step to successful translation of new health care treatments. In this clinical report, clinician-stakeholder feedback is presented for the magnetic levator prosthesis (MLP), a promising noninvasive spectacle device that restores eyelid motility with magnetic force. PURPOSE This study aimed to evaluate MLP clinical need and translational barriers. METHODS Ten vision rehabilitation optometrists who attended an educational presentation on the MLP and participated in a hands-on workshop in the fitting of a patient were invited to complete an anonymous online survey. Ten multiple-choice items gathered data on estimated patient need, current approaches, main barriers to MLP, temporary versus chronic use, cost barriers, and need for insurance coverage. Open fields allowed for additional comments. RESULTS Nine of 10 specialists completed the survey. Of those, seven answered that they could potentially see at least 1 to 5 patients for ptosis management within a year. The most common ptosis management options reported were the ptosis crutch, taping the eyelid open, and oxymetazoline drops, all with six responses each. Seven clinicians indicated that cost was a main concern. If cost to patient was not a barrier, all indicated they would be at least somewhat likely to try the MLP (1) for temporary management of ptosis, (2) as a pre-surgical trial, and (3) for long-term management of ptosis, with more selecting extremely likely and very likely than somewhat likely. Main comments were expressing enthusiasm for the technology and that it would be more appealing for patients if covered by insurance. CONCLUSIONS This clinical report suggests that the main barriers to clinical success of the MLP may be cost and insurance coverage, appearance of the device, and self-application. Possible solutions are cost-benefit analysis research, engineering efforts to reduce spectacle magnet size and improve the ease of eyelid magnet application.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Optometry,Ophthalmology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3