Comparison of a Novel Binocular Refraction System with Standard Digital Phoropter Refraction

Author:

Bossie Timothy,Reilly Jennifer1,Vera-Diaz Fuensanta A.1

Affiliation:

1. New England College of Optometry (NECO), Boston, Massachusetts

Abstract

SIGNIFICANCE New refractive technologies are consistently emerging in the optometry market, necessitating validation against current clinical standards. PURPOSE This study aimed to compare the refractive measurements between standard digital phoropter refraction and the Chronos binocular refraction system. METHODS Standardized subjective refraction was conducted on 70 adult participants using two separate refraction systems. The final subjective values from both devices were compared for M, J 0, and J 45. The time taken to complete refraction and patient's comfort were also evaluated. RESULTS Good agreement was found between the standard and Chronos refraction, with narrow mean differences (including 95% confidence intervals) and no significant bias for M (0.03 D, −0.05 to 0.11 D), J 0 (−0.02 D, −0.05 to −0.01 D), and J 45 (−0.01 D, −0.03 to 0.01 D). The bounds of the limits of agreement of M were −0.62 (lower bound; −0.76 to −0.49) and 0.68 (upper bound; 0.54 to 0.81), those of J 0 were −0.24 (lower bound; −0.29 to −0.19) and 0.19 (upper bound; 0.15 to 0.24), and those of J 45 were −0.18 (lower bound; −0.21 to −0.14) and 0.16 (upper bound; 0.12 to 0.19). No significant differences were noted between the two techniques for any of the refraction components (M standard = −3.03 ± 2.42 D, M novel = −3.06 ± 2.37 D, z = 0.07, P = .47; J 0 standard = 0.12 ± 0.40 D, J 0 novel = 0.15 ± 0.41 D, z = 1.32, P = .09; J 45 standard = −0.04 ± 0.19 D, J 45 novel = −0.03 ± 0.19 D, z = 0.50, P = .31). The Chronos was significantly faster than the standard technique, with an average difference of 19 seconds (standard, 190 ± 44 seconds; novel, 171 ± 38 seconds; z = 4.91; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS The final subjective refraction end points of the standard technique and the Chronos were well aligned in this group of adult participants, and no statistically or clinically significant differences were noted in M, J 0, or J 45 components. The Chronos offered improved efficiency, meeting the demands of eye care.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Optometry,Ophthalmology

Reference28 articles.

1. Clinical Evaluation of the Allergan Humphrey 500 Autorefractor and the Nidek AR-1000 Autorefractor;Br J Ophthalmol,1996

2. The Repeatability of Automated and Clinician Refraction;Optom Vis Sci,1998

3. Repeatability of Subjective and Objective Refraction;Optom Vis Sci,1995

4. Steps Towards Smarter Solutions in Optometry and Ophthalmology—Inter-device Agreement of Subjective Methods to Assess the Refractive Errors of the Eye;Healthcare (Basel),2016

5. Beyond Traditional Subjective Refraction;Curr Opin Ophthalmol,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3