Comparison between cycloplegic and noncycloplegic refraction in young adult myopes

Author:

Khan Hashim Ali,Tran Huy,Naduvilath Thomas John,Tahhan Nina,Ha Thao1,Sankaridurg Padmaja2

Affiliation:

1. Hai Yen Eye Care, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

2. School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

Abstract

SIGNIFICANCE This study explores the difference between cycloplegic and noncycloplegic refraction in young adult myopes. PURPOSE From the available literature, it is unclear whether cycloplegia is necessary when refracting young adults. This study investigates the agreement between noncycloplegic autorefraction and cycloplegic autorefraction and investigates factors affecting the agreement between the two methods. METHODS In total, 125 myopes with ages ranging between 18 and 26 years were included from Australia and Vietnam. Each participant underwent noncycloplegic autorefraction and cycloplegic autorefraction. Cycloplegia was induced with 1% ophthalmic tropicamide. RESULTS The mean spherical equivalent difference (95% confidence interval) between noncycloplegic autorefraction and cycloplegic autorefraction was −0.20 D (−0.25 to −0.14 D; t 124 = −7.18, p<0.0001). A mean difference of >0.25 D was seen in 46.8% of eyes. The lower and upper limits of agreement were −0.80 and 0.41 D, respectively. With univariate analysis, factors including age, degree of refractive error, accommodation amplitude, and distance phorias showed no impact on the average difference between cycloplegic autorefraction and noncycloplegic autorefraction. Yet, eyes with near exophoria (F 2,120 = 6.63, p=0.0019) and Caucasian eyes (F 3,121 = 2.85, p=0.040) exhibited the smallest paired differences. However, in the multivariate analysis, only near exophoria was associated with a lower mean difference. A significantly smaller proportion (34.9%) of eyes with near exophoria had a paired difference of −0.25 D or more compared with esophoria (50%) and orthophoria (65%; χ 2 = 6.6, p=0.038). CONCLUSIONS Noncycloplegic autorefraction results in more myopic refractive error than cycloplegic autorefraction in young adults.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3