Affiliation:
1. African Vision Research Institute, Department of Optometry, School of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
2. Department of Ophthalmic Sciences, Faculty of Health and Wellness Sciences, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town, South Africa
Abstract
SIGNIFICANCE
Uncorrected refractive errors (UREs) present an enormous lifetime burden in children. Despite this, there is a dearth of knowledge on URE-related preference-based quality of life (QoL) in East Africa. This study demonstrates the positive impact of interventions on UREs; hence, it provides an empirical justification for advocacy to improve the QoL of children with URE.
PURPOSE
This study investigated the preference-based QoL (utility) for URE in school-going adolescents of Kakamega County, in Kenya.
METHODS
An observational cross-sectional study with multistage sampling was conducted on randomly selected secondary school adolescents. School-going adolescents in Forms 1 to 4 were clinically examined for the presence of URE and classified according to their URE types. Pre-screened students who met the selection criteria were classified into two groups: URE and normal sight. Participants in the normal-sight group were randomly selected from among screened students without URE. Selected participants were administered a previously validated adolescent-specific utility weighting instrument—Assessment of Quality of Life—Six Dimensions.
RESULTS
A total of 330 participants aged 17.32 ± 1.60 years (URE, 17.50 ± 1.58 years; normal-sight, 17.15 ± 1.61 years) were included in the study. The mean utility score, as elicited by the Assessment of Quality of Life—Six Dimensions scoring algorithm, was better in the normal-sight group (URE, 0.496 ± 0.22; normal sight, 0.567 ± 0.25) at baseline, whereas the reverse was true at follow-up (URE, 0.655 ± 0.20; normal sight, 0.603 ± 0.25). In all cases, the differences were significant (P < .05); however, there was no significantly better (P > .05) utility elicited by any URE subtype at any given time point. Nonetheless, the URE group showed significantly better utility (P < .05) after spectacle correction.
CONCLUSIONS
Uncorrected refractive errors are associated with reduced utility in school-going adolescents, regardless of URE subtype. Spectacle correction resulted in a significantly improved utility for those with URE. Thus, this study recommends early public health strategies and spectacle interventions in schools for adolescents with URE.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)