Patient Safety Indicators During the Initial COVID-19 Pandemic Surge in the United States

Author:

Rodriguez Jorge A.,Samal Lipika,Ganesan Sandya1,Yuan Nina H.1,Wien Matthew1,Ng Kenney2,Huang Hu3,Park Yoonyoung2,Rajmane Amol3,Jackson Gretchen Purcell,Lipsitz Stuart R.,Bates David W.,Levine David M.

Affiliation:

1. Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women’s Hospital

2. IBM Research, Cambridge

3. IBM Watson Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts

Abstract

Objective The COVID-19 pandemic presented a challenge to inpatient safety. It is unknown whether there were spillover effects due to COVID-19 into non–COVID-19 care and safety. We sought to evaluate the changes in inpatient Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality patient safety indicators (PSIs) in the United States before and during the first surge of the pandemic among patients admitted without COVID-19. Methods We analyzed trends in PSIs from January 2019 to June 2020 in patients without COVID-19 using data from IBM MarketScan Commercial Database. We included members of employer-sponsored or Medicare supplemental health plans with inpatient, non–COVID-19 admissions. The primary outcomes were risk-adjusted composite and individual PSIs. Results We analyzed 1,869,430 patients admitted without COVID-19. Among patients without COVID-19, the composite PSI score was not significantly different when comparing the first surge (Q2 2020) to the prepandemic period (e.g., Q2 2020 score of 2.46 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 2.34–2.58] versus Q1 2020 score of 2.37 [95% CI, 2.27–2.46]; P = 0.22). Individual PSIs for these patients during Q2 2020 were also not significantly different, except in-hospital fall with hip fracture (e.g., Q2 2020 was 3.42 [95% CI, 3.34–3.49] versus Q4 2019 was 2.45 [95% CI, 2.40–2.50]; P = 0.01). Conclusions The first surge of COVID-19 was not associated with worse inpatient safety for patients without COVID-19, highlighting the ability of the healthcare system to respond to the initial surge of the pandemic.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3