Comparative Impact Analysis of Low-Deductible Insurance Versus In-house Hospital Assumption of Risk and Management on Medical Malpractice Claims

Author:

Vetrugno Giuseppe,Grassi Simone1,Foti Federica2,Siodambro Chiara1,Grassi Vincenzo M.2,Conte Celeste1,Ghisellini Renato2,De-Giorgio Fabio1,Ausania Francesco1,Cittadini Francesca1,Rossi Riccardo1,Morte Gabriele Della3,Caputo Matteo4,Pascali Vincenzo L.1,Ozonoff Al,Oliva Antonio1

Affiliation:

1. Legal Medicine, Department of Health Surveillance and Bioethics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore

2. Risk Management Unit, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS

3. International Law, Institute of International Studies

4. Criminal Law, Department of Juridical Science, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan

Abstract

Objectives Claims management is critical to ensure the safe and high-quality medical care for which liability insurers and/or hospitals are responsible. The aim of this research is to determine whether increasing hospital malpractice risk exposure, with increasing deductibles, has an impact on malpractice claims and payouts. Methods The study was conducted at a single tertiary hospital, the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy. Payouts on closed reported and registered claims were analyzed during 4-study periods, which ranged from 1.5 million euro annual aggregate deductibles entirely managed by the insurance company to 5 million euro annual aggregate deductibles entirely managed by the hospital. We retrospectively analyzed 2034 medical malpractice claims submitted between January 1, 2007, and August 31, 2021. Four periods were examined depending on the claims management model adopted, ranging from total outsourcing to the insurer (period A) to an almost total hospital assumption of risk method (period D). Results We found that progressive hospital assumption of risk is associated with a decrease in the incidence of medical malpractice claims (average variation per year: −3.7%; P = 0.0029 if the 2 initial periods and the 2 last periods—characterized by the highest risk retention—are respectively aggregated and compared), an initial decrease in the mean claims cost followed by an increase that is still lower than the national increase (−5.4% on average), and an increase in the total claims cost (when compared with the period where the insurer solely managed claims). We also found that the rate of increase in payouts was less than the national average. Conclusions The assumption of more malpractice risk by the hospital was associated with the adoption of numerous patient safety and risk management initiatives. The decrease in claims incidence could be due to the implementation of patient safety policies, while the cost increase could be attributed to inflation and rising costs of healthcare services and claims. Notably, only the hospital assumption of risk model with a high-deductible insurance coverage is sustainable for the studied hospital, while also being profitable for the insurer. In conclusion, as hospitals progressively assumed more risk and management responsibility of malpractice claims, there was a progressive decrease in the total number of claims, and a less rapid rise in claim payouts as compared with the national average. Even a small assumption of risk appeared to elicit meaningful changes in claim filings and payouts.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Leadership and Management

Reference19 articles.

1. Catastrophic medical malpractice payouts in the United States;J Healthc Qual,2014

2. The growth of physician medical malpractice payments: evidence from the National Practitioner Data Bank;Health Aff (Millwood),2005

3. Retrospective analysis of medical malpractice claims in tertiary hospitals of China: the view from patient safety;BMJ Open,2020

4. Rates and characteristics of paid malpractice claims among US physicians by specialty, 1992−2014;JAMA Intern Med,2017

5. Resolving malpractice claims after tort reform: experience in a self-insured Texas public academic health system;Health Serv Res,2016

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3