Improving the Quality of Maternity Care: Learning From Malpractice

Author:

Shi MeihongORCID,Zhang HuaORCID,Huang Siyuan1ORCID,Zhang MingfengORCID,Hu Xiuying2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Southwest Medical University, Luzhou

2. Innovation Center of Nursing Research, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/Nursing Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, China.

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to depict the characteristics, injury outcomes, and payment of obstetric malpractice lawsuits to better understand the medicolegal burden in obstetrics and categorize the causes of obstetric malpractice lawsuits using The National Health Service Litigation Authority coding taxonomy for further quality improvement in maternity care. Methods We reviewed and retrieved key information on court records of legal trials from China Judgment Online between 2013 and 2021. Results A total of 3441 obstetric malpractice lawsuits successfully claimed were reviewed in this study, with a total indemnity payment of $139,875,375. After peaking in 2017, the number of obstetric malpractice claims begins to decline. Of the 2424 hospitals that were sued, 8.3% (201/2424) were referred to as “repeat defendant” because they were involved in multiple lawsuits. Death and injury were the outcomes in 53.4% and 46.6% of the cases, respectively. The most common outcome type was neonatal death, which made up 29.8% of all cases. The median indemnity payment for death was higher compared with injury (P < 0.05). In terms of detailed injury outcomes, the major neonatal injury had higher median indemnity payments than neonatal death and fetal death (P < 0.05). The median indemnity payment of the major maternal injury was higher than that of maternal death (P < 0.05). The leading causes of obstetric malpractice were the management of birth complications and adverse events (23.3%), management of labor (14.4%), career decision making (13.7%), fetal surveillance (11.0%), and cesarean section management (9.5%). The cause for 8.7% of cases was high payment (≥$100, 000). As indicated by the results of the multivariate analysis, the hospitals in the midland of China (odds ratio [OR], 0.476; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.348–0.651), the hospitals in the west of China (OR, 0.523; 95% CI, 0.357–0.767), and the secondary hospitals (OR, 0.587; 95% CI, 0.356–0.967) had lower risks of high payment. Hospitals with ultimate liability (OR, 9.695; 95% CI, 4.072–23.803), full liability (OR, 16.442; 95% CI, 6.231–43.391), major neonatal injury (OR, 12.326; 95% CI, 5.836–26.033), major maternal injury (OR, 20.885; 95% CI, 7.929–55.011), maternal death (OR, 18.783; 95% CI, 8.887–39.697), maternal death with child injury (OR, 54.682; 95% CI, 10.900–274.319), maternal injury with child death (OR, 6.935; 95% CI, 2.773–17.344), and deaths of both mother and child (OR, 12.770; 95% CI, 5.136–31.754) had higher risks of high payment. In the causative domain, only anesthetics had a higher risk of high payment (OR, 5.605; 95% CI, 1.347–23.320), but anesthetic-related lawsuits made up just 1.4% of all cases. Conclusions The healthcare systems had to pay a significant amount as a result of obstetric malpractice lawsuits. Greater efforts are required to minimize serious injury outcomes and improve obstetric quality in the risky domains.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Leadership and Management

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3