Abstract
Purpose
The aim of the study is to identify the most common avoidable patient injuries related to hallux valgus surgery.
Methods
We assessed the claims reported to the Norwegian System of Patient Injury Compensation (NPE) following surgery for hallux valgus in light of hospital volume. Data from NPE was categorized according to age, sex, reason for claim, and reason for accepted/rejected claim. The institutions were grouped by catchment population into low volume (<150,000), middle volume (150,000–300,000), and high volume (>300,000) institutions. The effect of hospital volume on the likelihood of an accepted claim was estimated.
Results
NPE received 369 claims of which 173 (46.9%) were accepted. The main reason for accepted claims was recurrence of the deformity, wrong level osteotomy or insufficient fixation. A quarter of the claims were accepted because of lack of indication and one in 5 accepted claims was due to a postoperative infection. Patient treated at low-volume institutions had a higher fraction of accepted claims (P < 0.01). The odds ratio for an accepted claim in the low volume hospitals was 5.8 (95% confidence interval 4.1–8.3) compared with the middle- and high-volume institutions.
Conclusions
The likelihood of a treatment error that leads to compensation was higher in low-volume institutions.
Level of Evidence. Level II Prospective cohort study
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)