Affiliation:
1. From Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York (S.G.M., C.C., E.E.M.); Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York (S.G.M., C.C., E.E.M.); Department of Anesthesiology and Departments of Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care Medicine (S.G.M., C.C., E.E.M.), Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria; Institute for Healthcare Delivery Science, D
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Multimodal analgesia is increasingly considered routine practice in joint arthroplasties, but supportive large-scale data are scarce. The authors aimed to determine how the number and type of analgesic modes is associated with reduced opioid prescription, complications, and resource utilization.
Methods
Total hip/knee arthroplasties (N = 512,393 and N = 1,028,069, respectively) from the Premier Perspective database (2006 to 2016) were included. Analgesic modes considered were opioids, peripheral nerve blocks, acetaminophen, steroids, gabapentin/pregabalin, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, or ketamine. Groups were categorized into “opioids only” and 1, 2, or more than 2 additional modes. Multilevel models measured associations between multimodal analgesia and opioid prescription, cost/length of hospitalization, and opioid-related adverse effects. Odds ratios or percent change and 95% CIs are reported.
Results
Overall, 85.6% (N = 1,318,165) of patients received multimodal analgesia. In multivariable models, additions of analgesic modes were associated with stepwise positive effects: total hip arthroplasty patients receiving more than 2 modes (compared to “opioids only”) experienced 19% fewer respiratory (odds ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.94; unadjusted 1.0% [N = 1,513] vs. 2.0% [N = 1,546]), 26% fewer gastrointestinal (odds ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.84; unadjusted 1.5% [N = 2,234] vs. 2.5% [N = 1,984]) complications, up to a –18.5% decrease in opioid prescription (95% CI, –19.7% to –17.2%; 205 vs. 300 overall median oral morphine equivalents), and a –12.1% decrease (95% CI, –12.8% to –11.5%; 2 vs. 3 median days) in length of stay (all P < 0.05). Total knee arthroplasty analyses showed similar patterns. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors seemed to be the most effective modalities used.
Conclusions
While the optimal multimodal regimen is still not known, the authors’ findings encourage the combined use of multiple modalities in perioperative analgesic protocols.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Reference27 articles.
1. Multimodal analgesia for total joint arthroplasty.;Orthopedics,2015
2. Results of a multimodal analgesic trial involving patients with total hip or total knee arthroplasty.;Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ),2004
3. Multimodal pain management after total joint arthroplasty.;J Bone Joint Surg Am,2011
4. Variations in the use of perioperative multimodal analgesic therapy.;Anesthesiology,2016
5. Transforming the Premier Perspective Hospital Database into the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) common data model.;EGEMS (Wash DC),2014