Blinded Intraoperative Quantitative Indocyanine Green Metrics Associate With Intestinal Margin Acceptance in Colorectal Surgery

Author:

Adams Evan D.1,Salem Jean F.2,Burch Miguel A1,Fleshner Phillip R12,Zaghiyan Karen N.12

Affiliation:

1. Department of General Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California

2. Division of Colorectal Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Indocyanine green is a useful tool in colorectal surgery. Quantitative values may enhance and standardize its application. OBJECTIVE: To determine if quantitative indocyanine green metrics correlate with standard subjective indocyanine green perfusion assessment in acceptance or rejection of anastomotic margins. DESIGN: Prospective single arm, single institution cohort study. Surgeons viewed subjective indocyanine green images but were blinded to quantitative indocyanine green metrics. SETTING: Tertiary academic center. PATIENTS: Adults undergoing planned intestinal resection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Accepted perfusion and rejected perfusion of the intestinal margin were defined by absence or presence of ischemia by subjective indocyanine green and gross inspection. The primary outcomes were quantitative indocyanine green values, maximum fluorescence and time to maximum fluorescence in accepted compared to rejected perfusion. Secondary outcomes included maximum fluorescence and time to maximum fluorescence values in anastomotic leak. RESULTS: There were 89 perfusion assessments, comprising 156 intestinal segments. Nine segments were subjectively assessed to have poor perfusion by visual inspection and subjective indocyanine green. Maximum fluorescence (% intensity) exhibited higher intensity in accepted perfusion [accepted perfusion 161% (82-351) vs. rejected perfusion 63% (10 – 76); p = 0.03]. Similarly, time to maximum fluorescence (seconds) was earlier in accepted compared to rejected perfusion [10s (1 – 40) vs. 120s (90 – 120); p < 0.01]. Increased body mass index associated with higher maximum fluorescence. Anastomotic leak did not correlate with maximum fluorescence or time to maximum fluorescence. LIMITATIONS: Small cohort study, not powered to measure the association between quantitative indocyanine green metrics and anastomotic leak. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate blinded quantitative values reliably correlate with subjective indocyanine green perfusion assessment. Time to maximum intensity is an important metric in perfusion evaluation. Quantitative indocyanine green metrics may enhance intraoperative intestinal perfusion assessment. Future studies may attempt to correlate quantitative indocyanine green values with anastomotic leak.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Gastroenterology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3