Comparison of the Efficacy of Endoscopic Radial Incision and Cutting Procedure and Endoscopic Balloon Dilation for Benign Anastomotic Stricture After Low Anterior Resection Combined With Preventive Loop Ileostomy in Rectal Cancer

Author:

Wang Shijie12,Wan Jinliang12,Li Zhiming12,Long Chenyan12,Zhang Renyi12,Luo Yaxin3,Han Zelong3,Yan Jun12

Affiliation:

1. Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

2. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

3. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology, Department of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic radial incision and cutting procedure is a notable technique in the treatment of benign anastomotic strictures after low anterior resection in rectal cancer. However, the efficacy and safety of the endoscopic radial incision and cutting procedure and traditional endoscopic balloon dilation remain unknown. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of the endoscopic radial incision and cutting procedure and endoscopic balloon dilation in patients with anastomotic stricture after low anterior resection. DESIGN: Rectal cancer patients with anastomotic stricture after low anterior resection combined with synchronous preventive loop ileostomy between January 2014 and June 2021 were retrospectively collected. These patients underwent the endoscopic radial incision and cutting procedure or endoscopic balloon dilation as an initial treatment. The clinicopathological baseline data of the patients, endoscopic surgery success rate, complications, and restricture rate were analyzed. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at Nanfang Hospital in China. PATIENTS: A total of 30 patients were eligible after reviewing the medical records. Twenty patients underwent endoscopic balloon dilation, and 10 patients underwent endoscopic radial incision and cutting procedure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The adverse event rate and stricture recurrence rate. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in patient demographics or clinical features. No adverse events occurred in either of the 2 groups. The mean operation time was 18.9 ± 3.6 minutes in the endoscopic balloon dilation group and 10.2 ± 3.3 minutes in the endoscopic radial incision and cutting procedure group (p < 0.001). The stricture recurrence rates between the endoscopic balloon dilation group and the endoscopic radial incision and cutting procedure group were significantly different (44.4% vs 0%; p = 0.025). LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective study. CONCLUSIONS: The endoscopic radial incision and cutting procedure is safe and more efficacious than endoscopic balloon dilation for anastomotic stricture after low anterior resection combined with synchronous preventive loop ileostomy in rectal cancer.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Gastroenterology,General Medicine

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3