The Use of Different Sepsis Risk Stratification Tools on the Wards and in Emergency Departments Uncovers Different Mortality Risks: Results of the Three Welsh National Multicenter Point-Prevalence Studies-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The Use of Different Sepsis Risk Stratification Tools on the Wards and in Emergency Departments Uncovers Different Mortality Risks: Results of the Three Welsh National Multicenter Point-Prevalence Studies

Published:2021-10 Issue:10 Volume:3 Page:e0558
ISSN:2639-8028
Container-title:Critical Care Explorations
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Unwin Harry J. A.,Kopczynska Maja,Pugh Richard,Tan Laura J. P.,Subbe Christian P.,Ellis Gemma,Morgan Paul,Havalda Peter,Sharif Ben,Burke John,Szakmany Tamas

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference40 articles.

1. Time to treatment and mortality during mandated emergency care for sepsis.;Seymour;N Engl J Med,2017

2. Sepsis and septic shock.;Cecconi;Lancet,2018

3. Assessment of clinical criteria for sepsis: For the third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3).;Seymour;JAMA,2016

4. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine.;Bone;Chest,1992

5. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3).;Singer;JAMA,2016

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Prognostic performance of the REDS score, SOFA score, NEWS2 score, and the red-flag, NICE high-risk, and SIRS criteria to predict survival at 180 days, in emergency department patients admitted with suspected sepsis – An observational cohort study;Frontiers in Medicine;2023-03-14