Transcranial Color-Coded Sonography With Angle Correction As a Screening Tool for Raised Intracranial Pressure

Author:

Rajajee Venkatakrishna,Soroushmehr Reza,Williamson Craig A.,Najarian Kayvan,Ward Kevin123,Tiba Hakam12

Affiliation:

1. Max Harry Weil Institute for Critical Care Research and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

2. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Transcranial Doppler (TCD) has been evaluated as a noninvasive intracranial pressure (ICP) assessment tool. Correction for insonation angle, a potential source of error, with transcranial color-coded sonography (TCCS) has not previously been reported while evaluating ICP with TCD. Our objective was to study the accuracy of TCCS for detection of ICP elevation, with and without the use of angle correction. DESIGN: Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy. SETTING: Academic neurocritical care unit. PATIENTS: Consecutive adults with invasive ICP monitors. INTERVENTIONS: Ultrasound assessment with TCCS. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: End-diastolic velocity (EDV), time-averaged peak velocity (TAPV), and pulsatility index (PI) were measured in the bilateral middle cerebral arteries with and without angle correction. Concomitant mean arterial pressure (MAP) and ICP were recorded. Estimated cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) was calculated as estimated CPP (CPPe) = MAP × (EDV/TAPV) + 14, and estimated ICP (ICPe) = MAP–CPPe. Sixty patients were enrolled and 55 underwent TCCS. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of ICPe for detection of invasive ICP greater than 22 mm Hg revealed area under the curve (AUC) 0.51 (0.37–0.64) without angle correction and 0.73 (0.58–0.84) with angle correction. The optimal threshold without angle correction was ICPe greater than 18 mm Hg with sensitivity 71% (29–96%) and specificity 28% (16–43%). With angle correction, the optimal threshold was ICPe greater than 21 mm Hg with sensitivity 100% (54–100%) and specificity 30% (17–46%). The AUC for PI was 0.61 (0.47–0.74) without angle correction and 0.70 (0.55–0.92) with angle correction. CONCLUSIONS: Angle correction improved the accuracy of TCCS for detection of elevated ICP. Sensitivity was high, as appropriate for a screening tool, but specificity remained low.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3