Corticosteroids in Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review, Pairwise, and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis

Author:

Pitre Tyler1,Drover Katherine2,Chaudhuri Dipayan34,Zeraaktkar Dena35,Menon Kusum6,Gershengorn Hayley B.78,Jayaprakash Namita9,Spencer-Segal Joanna L.10,Pastores Stephen M.11,Nei Andrea M.12,Annane Djillali13,Rochwerg Bram34

Affiliation:

1. Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

2. Department of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

3. Department of Health Research Methods Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

4. Department of Critical Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

5. Department of Anesthesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

6. Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa and Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

7. Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL.

8. Division of Critical Care Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.

9. Department of Emergency Medicine and Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI.

10. Department of Internal Medicine and Michigan Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

11. Critical Care Center, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.

12. Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic Hospital—Rochester, Rochester, MN.

13. General Intensive Care Unit, Raymond Poincare Hospital (APHP), Garches, France and the School of Medicine Simone Veil, University Paris Saclay—Campus UVSQ, Paris, France.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of corticosteroids in patients with sepsis. DATA SOURCES: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, up to January 10, 2023. STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing corticosteroids with placebo or standard care with sepsis. DATA EXTRACTION: The critical outcomes of interest included mortality, shock reversal, length of stay in the ICU, and adverse events. DATA ANALYSIS: We performed both a pairwise and dose-response meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of different corticosteroid doses on outcomes. We used Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation to assess certainty in pooled estimates. DATA SYNTHESIS: We included 45 RCTs involving 9563 patients. Corticosteroids probably reduce short-term mortality (risk ratio [RR], 0.93; 95% CI, 0.88–0.99; moderate certainty) and increase shock reversal at 7 days (RR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.11–1.38; high certainty). Corticosteroids may have no important effect on duration of ICU stay (mean difference, –0.6 fewer days; 95% CI, 1.48 fewer to 0.27 more; low certainty); however, probably increase the risk of hyperglycemia (RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.08–1.18; moderate certainty) and hypernatremia (RR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.32–2.03; moderate certainty) and may increase the risk of neuromuscular weakness (RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.01–1.45; low certainty). The dose-response analysis showed a reduction in mortality with corticosteroids with optimal dosing of approximately 260 mg/d of hydrocortisone (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.83–0.98) or equivalent. CONCLUSIONS: We found that corticosteroids may reduce mortality and increase shock reversal but they may also increase the risk of hyperglycemia, hypernatremia, and neuromuscular weakness. The dose-response analysis indicates optimal dosing is around 260 mg/d of hydrocortisone or equivalent.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference30 articles.

1. Corticosteroids in severe sepsis and septic shock: A concise review.;Salluh;Shock,2017

2. Glucocorticoids in sepsis: To be or not to be.;Vandewalle;Front Immunol,2020

3. Corticosteroids in sepsis: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.;Rochwerg;Crit Care Med,2018

4. Corticosteroids for treating sepsis in children and adults.;Annane;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2019

5. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.;Page;BMJ,2021

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3