Nursing Assistant Staffing Model: Implementation and Outcome Evaluation in Taiwan Hospitals

Author:

YANG Pei-Hsuan1ORCID,CHEN Yao-Mei2ORCID,WU Li-Chuan3,CHEN Mei-Hsing4,HSIEH Hsiu-Fen5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. PhD, RN, Supervisor, Department of Nursing, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University; and Adjunct Assistant Professor, School of Nursing, Fooyin University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

2. PhD, RN, Associate Professor, College of Nursing, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; and Senior Specialist, Superintendent Office, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Taiwan

3. MSN, RN, Head Nurse, Community and Long-Term Care Division, Kaohsiung Municipal Cijin Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Taiwan

4. MS, RN, Senior Specialist, Superintendent Office, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Taiwan

5. PhD, RN, Associate Professor, College of Nursing, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background A key policy of the Taiwan healthcare system is promoting the hiring of nursing assistants (NAs) to reduce the workload of nurses. However, few studies in the literature have compared the relative effectiveness of different nurse staffing policies, and no studies have addressed the impact of the NA staffing (NAS) model. Purpose This study explored the current status of the NAS model as implemented in Taiwan hospitals and to investigate the methods used to evaluate the outcomes of NAS model implementation. Methods A cross-sectional online survey was performed in hospitals nationwide from June 1 to December 31, 2018. There were 153 government-accredited hospitals being invited to participate in the survey. Results Of the 139 hospitals that completed the online survey, 26% (36 hospitals) had implemented the NAS model. Many of the hospitals had hired full-time, certified NAs. Most of the tasks assigned to NAs were in the nonprofessional/general and technical work categories. In addition, medical wards were the most frequently assigned workplace, especially on day shifts. Few of the surveyed hospitals had evaluated the effectiveness of the NAS model. Improvement after implementation of the NAS model (based on the 35 outcome indicators) was found to vary significantly. The most commonly used outcome indicator was patient satisfaction. All the stakeholders, including patients, family caregivers, nurses, and nurse supervisors, supported implementation of the NAS model. However, some of the participants expressed concerns regarding the difficulties involved with model implementation. Conclusions/Implications for Practice Although the NAS model may be beneficial, further empirical research is necessary to confirm the contributions of NAs. Additional evidence regarding the benefits of the NAS model for hospital performance and patient outcomes may be expected to motivate more hospital administrators to adopt this model.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference29 articles.

1. Nursing skill mix in European hospitals: Cross-sectional study of the association with mortality, patient ratings, and quality of care;BMJ Quality & Safety,2017

2. Interventions to promote teamwork, delegation and communication among registered nurses and nursing assistants: An integrative review;Journal of Nursing Management,2020

3. Reflection on the application of skill-mixed care model in clinical settings;The Kaohsiung Journal of Nursing,2013

4. Investigation on the current status of nursing manpower in medical institutions;TUNA Newsletter Bimonthly,2014

5. The facilitation and prospects of schematization of skill-mixed nursing care model in Taiwan;Journal of Taiwan Nurse Practitioners,2016

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Implementing care-related services in care units - an interview study;BMC Health Services Research;2024-08-23

2. Evaluating Skill-Mix Models of Care;JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration;2023-12-05

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3