Measurement of humanity among interns of Internal Medicine Department, Damascus University: a cross-sectional study

Author:

Drie Tasneem1,Hodifa Yara1,Haidar Ghina1,Soud Alkousa Hamzeh2,Khalayli Naram3,Hodaifa Amr4,Hoha Ghofran1,Alghawe Fatima1,Kudsi Maysoun1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Rheumatology

2. Department of Cardiology

3. Department of Psychiatry

4. Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria

Abstract

Background: Although humanity is important within the medical health field, the authors lack studies that address this topic. Objective: The authors aimed to assess humanity among a sample of Syrian internal medicine interns. Methods: The authors have used a validated scale based on the Medical Humanity Scale (MHS) categorized into seven human values included in 30 questions (patient-oriented care, respect, empathy, ethics, altruism, and compassion). The scale can test the differentiation between these interns with different levels of medical humanity. A 7-point Likert scale was adopted. Six hundred sixty-five participants from the Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Damascus University entered our study. Results: The mean score of the MHS was 147.14 (13.1) Female residents humanity scores (mean 149.14, SD 15.1) was significantly higher than male students’ scores (mean 145.48, SD 13.35; P=.007), KMO=0.843>0.7, which is near 1, and the Bartlett test of sphericity =4187.043 (df=465; P=.01). The Cronbach α was >0.683, was indicating the validity and reliability of the scale. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that the humanity level is accepted by using a scale based on MHS among interns of the Internal Medicine Department, Damascus University.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference16 articles.

1. Measurement of humanity among health professionals: development and validation of the medical humanity scale using the Delphi method;Ataya;JMIR Form Res,2023

2. How patient autonomy drives the legal liabilities of medical practitioners and the practical ways to mitigate and resolve them;Kim;Postgrad Med J,2023

3. Supporting patient autonomy: the importance of clinician-patient relationships;Entwistle;J Gen Intern Med,2010

4. Feedback in the clinical setting;Burgess;BMC Med Educ,2020

5. Medical students’ and physicians’ attitudes toward patients’ consent to participate in clinical training;Omid;J Adv Med Educ Prof,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3