Does A Single Osteotomy Technique for Frozen Autograft (Pedicled Freezing) in Patients With Malignant Bone Tumors of the Long Bones Achieve Union and Local Tumor Control?

Abstract

Abstract Background Biological reconstruction by replanting the resected tumor-bearing segment is preferred by some surgeons when caring for a patient with a bone sarcoma. Frozen autografts are advantageous because they are cost-effective, provide an excellent fit, permit the maintenance of osteoinductive and osteoconductive properties, and are not associated with transmission of viral disease. The pedicle frozen autograft technique, in which only one osteotomy is made for the freezing procedure, keeping the affected segment in continuity with the host bone and soft tissue instead of two osteotomies, maintains the affected segment with the host bone and soft tissue. This could restore blood flow more rapidly in a frozen autograft than in a free-frozen autograft with two osteotomies. Questions/purposes (1) In what proportion of patients was union achieved by 6 months using this technique of frozen autografting? (2) What complications were observed in a small series using this approach? (3) What was the function of these patients as determined by Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score? (4) What proportion of patients experienced local recurrence? Methods Between 2014 and 2017, we treated 87 patients for primary sarcomas of the femur, tibia, or humerus. Of those, we considered patients who could undergo intercalary resection and showed a good response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy as potentially eligible for this technique. Based on these criteria, 49% (43 patients) were eligible; a further 9% (eight) were excluded because of inadequate bone quality (defined as cortical thickness less than 50% by CT assessment). We retrospectively studied 32 patients who were treated with a single metaphyseal osteotomy, the so-called pedicle freezing technique, which uses liquid nitrogen. There were 20 men and 12 women. The median age was 18 years (range 13 to 48 years). The median follow-up duration was 55 months (range 48 to 63 months). Patients were assessed clinically and radiologically regarding union (defined in this study as bony bridging of three of four cortices by 6 months), the proportion of patients experiencing local recurrence, the occurrence of nononcologic complications, and MSTS scores. Results Three percent (one of 32) of the patients had nonunion (no union by 9 months). The median MSTS score was 90%, with no evidence of metastases at the final follow-up interval. Nine percent (three of 32) of our patients died. The local recurrence rate was 3.1% (one of 32 patients). The mean restricted disease-free survival time at 60 months (5 years) was 58 months (95% CI 55 to 62 months). Twenty-five percent of patients (eight of 32) experienced nononcologic complications. This included superficial skin burns (two patients), superficial wound infection (two patients), deep venous thrombosis (one patient), transient nerve palsy (two patients), and permanent nerve palsy (one patient). Conclusion This treatment was reasonably successful in patients with sarcomas of the femur, tibia, and humerus who could undergo an intercalary resection, and this treatment did not involve the epiphysis and upper metaphysis. It avoids a second osteotomy site as in prior reports of freezing techniques, and union was achieved in all but one patient. There were few complications or local recurrences, and the patients’ function was shown to be good. This technique cannot be used in all long-bone sarcomas, but we believe this is a reasonable alternative treatment for patients who show a good response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, those in whom intercalary resection is feasible while retaining at least 2 cm of the subchondral area, and in those who have adequate bone stock to withstand the freezing process. Experienced surgeons who are well trained on the recycling technique in specialized centers are crucial to perform the technique. Further study is necessary to see how this technique compares with other reconstruction options. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic study.