Effects of Levosimendan on Diaphragmatic Dysfunction in Patients with Sepsis

Abstract

Abstract Objective In this study, our aim was to examine the effects of levosimendan on diaphragmatic dysfunction in patients with sepsis, as well as assess its impact on respiratory muscle contractility and the outcome of weaning. Methods This was a single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Patients with diaphragmatic dysfunction and failure of spontaneous breathing trials (SBT) were randomly and equally assigned to the experimental and control groups. The experimental group received levosimendan at a loading dose of 6 μg/kg for 10 minutes, followed by a continuous infusion at 0.2 μg/kg/min. The control group received an equivalent dose of a placebo. The pre- and post-administration respiratory mechanics parameters of the patients were recorded. Evaluation of the effect of levosimendan on patients with sepsis-induced diaphragm dysfunction comprised arterial blood gas analysis as well as ultrasound measurements of diaphragm excursion (DE), diaphragm thickness (DT), diaphragm thickening fraction (TFdi), and diaphragm-rapid shallow breathing index (D-RSBI). Results Forty-four patients were enrolled in the study. We found that post-administration of levosimendan, the patients’ tidal volume (GCSMV) increased, while the D-RSBI decreased, and the partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PACO2) decreased when compared to the pre-administration levels. Additionally, following levosimendan administration, patients showed increased DE and pressure support (PS) when compared to before administration (1.14 ± 0.177 vs. 1.22 ± 0.170 cm and 0.248 ± 0.03 vs. 0.284 ± 0.06, respectively), and decreased D-RSBI (22.76 ± 6.14 vs. 20.06 ± 6.04, respectively), all of which were statistically significant (P < 0.05). In contrast, in the control group of patients, there were no statistically significant differences in the post-administration levels of DE, TFdi, and D-RSBI as compared to the pre-administration period (P > 0.05). Furthermore, in terms of weaning outcomes, we did not find any statistically significant difference in the number of patients in the two groups who eventually underwent weaning (P = 0.545). Conclusion In this study, we found that levosimendan enhanced diaphragm contractile function. However, further investigations are required to explore its effect on weaning outcomes in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation.