Author:
Su Wan-Chun,Cleffi Corina,Srinivasan Sudha,Bhat Anjana Narayan
Abstract
Purpose:
Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) have motor, social communication, and behavioral challenges. During the pandemic, children lost access to face-to-face (F2F) services and had to revert to telehealth (TH) options. We compared the efficacy, fidelity, acceptability, and feasibility of a general motor (GM) intervention using an F2F or telehealth (TH) format.
Methods:
Fifteen children with ASD participated in an 8-week program involving gross motor games to promote motor and social communication skills. Differences across TH and F2F formats for motor and socially directed verbalization as well as stakeholder feedback on formats were collected.
Results:
Gross motor and socially directed verbalization did not differ between the F2F and TH subgroups, and parents and trainers were satisfied with either format. However, TH interventions were longer, had more technological challenges, and required more parental effort.
Conclusions:
The findings of this study support the use of TH as a comparable and viable substitute for F2F interactions for children with ASD.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Reference36 articles.
1. Pediatric physical therapy telehealth and COVID-19: factors, facilitators, and barriers influencing effectiveness—a survey study;Hall;Fam Community Health,2021
2. COVID-19 lessons from the field: toward a pediatric physical therapy telehealth framework;Fishman;Int J Telerehabil,2022
3. “Another tool in your toolkit”: pediatric occupational and physical therapists’ perspectives of initiating telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic;Wittmeier;Phys Occup Ther Pediatr,2022
4. Current trends in telehealth applications to deliver social communication interventions for young children with or at risk for Autism Spectrum Disorder;Simacek;Curr Dev Disord Rep,2021
5. Effectiveness of telerehabilitation in physical therapy: a rapid overview;Seron;Phys Ther,2021