Physician–hospital alignment: A definition and framework grounded in physicians’ perception

Author:

Brinsfield Chad T.,Priore Richard J.,Wehbi Nizar K.

Abstract

The alignment of physicians’ interests with those of their hospital has garnered considerable interest in recent years, in part because of their central role in health care expenditure and patient outcomes. However, the systematic study of physician–hospital alignment is currently impeded by a lack of construct clarity. This is evidenced by research that conflates the actions intended to create alignment with alignment itself. It is also evidenced by a variety of different definitions, conceptualizations, and measures in the literature, most of which are confounded with constructs that are something other than alignment (e.g., commitment, trust). Critical Theoretical Analysis We draw on agency theory and person–organization fit to define physician–hospital alignment as a physician’s perception that their financial incentives, goals, and values and those of their hospital are mutually supporting and reinforcing rather than in conflict with one another. Advance To better understand the nature of the construct and to help guide future research, we present an integrative framework grounded in physicians’ perceptions. Practice Implication Our definition and framework set the stage for improved construct validation and more systematic study and management of physician–hospital alignment.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Strategy and Management,Health Policy,Leadership and Management

Reference34 articles.

1. Risk assumption and physician alignment with health care organizations;Medical Care,2001

2. Unconscious thought works bottom-up and conscious thought works top-down when forming an impression;Social Cognition,2011

3. Aligning employees through “line of sight.”;Business Horizons,2006

4. How different governance models may impact physician–hospital alignment;Health Care Management Review,2020

5. The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions;Journal of Applied Psychology,2002

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3