Author:
Bergami Massimo,Bullini Orlandi Ludovico,Giuri Paola,Lipparini Andrea,Manca Claudia,Poggioli Gilberto,Russo Marcello,Viale Pierluigi
Abstract
Background
Previous research has identified some tensions that public organizations may encounter during crises. However, there remains a scarcity of research examining how public health care organizations effectively navigate these tensions to reconcile the diverse interests, needs, and demands from various stakeholders.
Purposes
The study seeks to shed light on the dynamics underlying the tensions experienced by public hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic. It illustrates how different hospitals' actors have navigated these tensions, identifying solutions and approaches that fostered collaborative endeavors among internal and external stakeholders.
Methodology
The study draws on qualitative analyses of 49 semistructured interviews and the notes from two focus groups involving key informants at one of the largest university hospitals in Italy. We also rely on the verbatim transcripts from meetings involving the members of the temporary emergency team constituting the taskforce.
Findings
The results highlight the tensions that emerged throughout the different waves of the COVID-19 pandemic and how various actors have managed them in a way to reconcile opposing forces while unleashing adaptability and creativity.
Practice Implications
Hospital managers would benefit from developing a paradoxical mindset for crisis preparedness, allowing them to embrace existing tensions and devise creative solutions to favor resilience and change.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Reference27 articles.
1. Organising for effective emergency: Management: Lessons from research;Australian Journal of Public Administration,2010
2. Crises and crisis management: Integration, interpretation, and research development;Journal of Management,2017
3. Crisis management in hindsight: Cognition, communication, coordination, and control;Public Administration Review,2007
4. Flexibility and rigidity in crisis management and learning at Swedish public organizations;Public Management Review,2010
5. Is best practice always the best? Learning to become better crisis managers;Journal of Critical Incident Analysis,2012