Embracing tensions throughout crises: The case of an Italian university hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic

Author:

Bergami Massimo,Bullini Orlandi Ludovico,Giuri Paola,Lipparini Andrea,Manca Claudia,Poggioli Gilberto,Russo Marcello,Viale Pierluigi

Abstract

Background Previous research has identified some tensions that public organizations may encounter during crises. However, there remains a scarcity of research examining how public health care organizations effectively navigate these tensions to reconcile the diverse interests, needs, and demands from various stakeholders. Purposes The study seeks to shed light on the dynamics underlying the tensions experienced by public hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic. It illustrates how different hospitals' actors have navigated these tensions, identifying solutions and approaches that fostered collaborative endeavors among internal and external stakeholders. Methodology The study draws on qualitative analyses of 49 semistructured interviews and the notes from two focus groups involving key informants at one of the largest university hospitals in Italy. We also rely on the verbatim transcripts from meetings involving the members of the temporary emergency team constituting the taskforce. Findings The results highlight the tensions that emerged throughout the different waves of the COVID-19 pandemic and how various actors have managed them in a way to reconcile opposing forces while unleashing adaptability and creativity. Practice Implications Hospital managers would benefit from developing a paradoxical mindset for crisis preparedness, allowing them to embrace existing tensions and devise creative solutions to favor resilience and change.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference27 articles.

1. Organising for effective emergency: Management: Lessons from research;Australian Journal of Public Administration,2010

2. Crises and crisis management: Integration, interpretation, and research development;Journal of Management,2017

3. Crisis management in hindsight: Cognition, communication, coordination, and control;Public Administration Review,2007

4. Flexibility and rigidity in crisis management and learning at Swedish public organizations;Public Management Review,2010

5. Is best practice always the best? Learning to become better crisis managers;Journal of Critical Incident Analysis,2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3