Differential Effects of HDAC6 Inhibition Versus Knockout During Hepatic Ischemia–reperfusion Injury Highlight Importance of HDAC6 C-terminal Zinc-finger Ubiquitin-binding Domain

Abstract

Background. Ischemia–reperfusion injury (IRI) causes significant morbidity in liver transplantation among other medical conditions. IRI following liver transplantation contributes to poor outcomes and early graft loss. Histone/protein deacetylases (HDACs) regulate diverse cellular processes, play a role in mediating tissue responses to IRI, and may represent a novel therapeutic target in preventing IRI in liver transplantation. Methods. Using a previously described standardized model of murine liver warm IRI, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were assessed at 24 and 48 h after reperfusion to determine the effect of different HDAC inhibitors. Results. Broad HDAC inhibition with trichostatin-A (TSA) was protective against hepatocellular damage (P < 0.01 for AST and P < 0.05 for ALT). Although HDAC class I inhibition with MS-275 provided statistically insignificant benefit, tubastatin-A (TubA), an HDAC6 inhibitor with additional activity against HDAC10, provided significant protection against liver IRI (P < 0.01 for AST and P < 0.001 for ALT). Surprisingly genetic deletion of HDAC6 or -10 did not replicate the protective effects of HDAC6 inhibition with TubA, whereas treatment with an HDAC6 BUZ-domain inhibitor, LakZnFD, eliminated the protective effect of TubA treatment in liver ischemia (P < 0.01 for AST and P < 0.01 for ALT). Conclusions. Our findings suggest TubA, a class IIb HDAC inhibitor, can mitigate hepatic IRI in a manner distinct from previously described class I HDAC inhibition and requires the HDAC6 BUZ-domain activity. Our data corroborate previous findings that HDAC targets for therapeutic intervention of IRI may be tissue-specific, and identify HDAC6 inhibition as a possible target in the treatment of liver IRI.