Preservative-Free Bimatoprost 0.01% Ophthalmic Gel for Glaucoma Therapy: A Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial

Author:

Muñoz-Negrete Francisco J.12,Topouzis Fotis3,Oddone Francesco4,Nisslé Sylvie5,Rokicki Dariusz5,Januleviciene Ingrida6,Harasymowycz Paul78,Stalmans Ingeborg910

Affiliation:

1. Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal

2. Faculty of Medicine, University of Alcalá, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain (Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Alcalá, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain)

3. Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, AHEPA Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece

4. Clinical and Research Institute of Ophthalmology, IRCCS—Fondazione Bietti, Rome, Italy

5. Laboratoires Thea, Clermont-Ferrand, France

6. Department of Ophthalmology, Eye Clinic of Medical Academy of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania

7. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Montreal

8. Bellevue Ophthalmology Clinics and Montreal Glaucoma Institute, Montreal, Canada

9. Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospitals UZ Leuven

10. Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Research Group of Ophthalmology, Catholic University KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Abstract

Précis: Noninferiority of efficacy was demonstrated for a preservative-free bimatoprost 0.01% compared with BAK-containing bimatoprost 0.01% following a 12-week treatment period in patients with open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Improved tolerability, in particular conjunctival hyperemia, was also observed. Purpose: To evaluate the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy and safety of a preservative-free bimatoprost 0.01% ophthalmic gel (PFB 0.01% gel) compared with preserved bimatoprost 0.01% (PB 0.01%). Design: Phase III, international, multicenter, randomized, 2-parallel group, investigator-masked, 3-month treatment duration. Methods: Patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension were randomized after a 7-week run-in/washout period to receive once-daily PFB 0.01% gel (n=236) or PB 0.01% (n=249) for 3 months. The primary efficacy measure was changed from baseline in IOP at week 12. Safety measures included adverse events (AEs) and assessment of conjunctival hyperemia. Results: The mean changes from baseline in IOP at week 12 in the PFB 0.01% gel and PB 0.01% were −9.72±2.97 and −9.47±3.06 mm Hg, respectively, at 8 am, −9.41±3.03 and −9.19±3.12 mm Hg at 10 am, and −8.99±3.36 and −8.54±3.44 mm Hg at 4 pm. Noninferiority of PFB 0.01% gel to PB 0.01% was demonstrated at week 12 based on predetermined criteria (upper 95% CI margin of 1.5 mmHg at all time points). The most frequently reported AE was conjunctival hyperemia; 13 (5.5%) patients with PFB 0.01% gel and 17 (6.8%) patients with PB 0.01%. The percentage of patients experiencing a worsening from baseline in conjunctival hyperemia score was lower with PFB 0.01% gel compared to PB 0.01% at week 6 (20.1% vs. 29.3%, respectively) and week 12 (18.3% vs. 30.4%, respectively). Conclusions: PFB 0.01% ophthalmic gel has the same efficacy in lowering IOP as PB 0.01% and demonstrated less aggravation of conjunctival hyperemia at weeks 6 and 12.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3