Reliability of Measurements Using Ocular Response Analyzer as Screening Tonometer and Corneal Hysteresis Values in the Presence or Absence of Glaucomatous Changes in Fundus

Author:

Maruyama Katsuhiko,Sugiura Natsumi,Taki Toshie

Abstract

Précis: Use of the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) as a screening tonometer in clinical practice yielded reliable measurements in over 80% of eyes screened. Including corneal hysteresis (CH) data in screening may improve the accuracy of glaucoma detection. Purpose: To examine measurement reliability when the ORA is used as a screening tonometer, and to compare CH measurements in eyes with and those without glaucomatous changes in the fundus. Patients and Methods: 1488 eyes of 747 patients (mean age: 53.5±20.4 y, range: 6–94 y) underwent intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement using ORA as screening. The percentage of eyes with a waveform score ≥6, the recommended threshold indicating reliability, was calculated. Eyes that had waveform score ≥6 and had undergone fundus photography and optical coherence tomography were assessed for the presence or absence of glaucomatous changes in fundus from optical coherence tomography and fundus images, and CH was compared between the 2 groups. Results: Mean±SD (range) of ORA measurements were: Goldmann-correlated IOP 14.9±4.8 (1.0–63.2) mm Hg, corneal-compensated IOP 16.2±4.7 (3.2–73.6) mm Hg, CH 9.7±1.5 (0.0–20.6) mm Hg, and waveform score 7.3±1.5 (0.1–9.7). Eighty-four percent of eyes had a waveform score ≥6. Among 192 eyes (127 patients, aged 53.5±18.0 y) with waveform score ≥6 and evaluable for glaucomatous changes in the fundus, 53 eyes were determined as positive and 139 eyes as negative. CH was 9.6±1.4 (6.8–13.3) mm Hg in the positive group and 10.2±1.2 (6.9–13.3) mm Hg in the negative group, and was significantly lower in the positive group (P=0.003). Conclusion: When using ORA as a screening tonometer, reliable results were obtained in ~80% of the eyes. CH was lower in the glaucomatous change-positive group compared with the glaucomatous change-negative group, but the ranges overlapped between the 2 groups.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Ophthalmology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3