Influence of Age, Sex, and Wait Times on Public Online Ratings of Glaucoma Physicians in the United States

Author:

Kim Joo Yeon1ORCID,Francisco Raia12,Wang Jiaying1,Liu Jacob J.1,Stephenson Nathaniel J.1,Khalil Charbel bou13,Kim Dong Hyeon1,Nguyen Anne X.4,Youn Gun Min13,Sun Yang13,Wu Albert Y.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University School of Medicine

2. Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA

3. Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA

4. McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada

Abstract

Précis: Glaucoma surgeons are highly rated by the general public. Physicians with shorter wait times and who are younger are more likely to have higher ratings. Female glaucoma physicians are less likely to have higher ratings. Purpose: Find what characteristics of glaucoma physicians are associated with higher online ratings. Methods: All American members of the American Glaucoma Society were queried on Healthgrades, Vitals, and Yelp. Ratings, medical school ranking, region of practice, sex, age, and wait times were recorded. Results: One thousand one hundred six (78.2%) of American Glaucoma Society members had at least 1 review across the 3 platforms. The average score among glaucoma surgeons was 4.160 (0.898 SD). Female physicians were associated with lower online ratings [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.536; 95% CI 0.354–0.808]. Physicians with <30 minutes of wait time had higher ratings: 15–30 minutes wait time (aOR: 2.273; 95% CI: 1.430–3.636) and <15 minutes wait time (aOR: 3.102; 95% CI: 1.888–5.146). Older physicians had lower ratings (aOR: 0.384; 95% CI: 0.255–0.572). Conclusions: Public online ratings of glaucoma specialists in the United States seem to favor those of younger age, men, and those with shorter wait times.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Ophthalmology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3