Do current methods of measuring the impact of chronic pain on work reflect the experience of working-age adults? An integrated mixed-methods systematic narrative review

Author:

Stagg Anne L.1ORCID,Madan Ira1ORCID,Fear Nicola2ORCID,Stevens Martin J.3ORCID,Wainwright Elaine3ORCID,Hoving Jan L.4ORCID,Macfarlane Gary J.3ORCID,Hollick Rosemary3ORCID,Morton LaKrista3ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Versus Arthritis/Medical Research Council Centre for Musculoskeletal Health and Work (Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London), London, United Kingdom

2. Versus Arthritis/Medical Research Council Centre for Musculoskeletal Health and Work (King's Centre for Military Health Research, King's College London), London, United Kingdom

3. Versus Arthritis/Medical Research Council Centre for Musculoskeletal Health and Work (University of Aberdeen), Aberdeen, United Kingdom

4. Department of Public and Occupational Health, Cochrane Work, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract Chronic pain affects individuals' work participation. The impact of chronic pain on work has historically been measured through sickness absence, though it is now appreciated that the impacts on work are far wider. This mixed-methods review aimed to identify the full range of impacts of pain on work in addition to impacts that are currently measured quantitatively to inform the development of a new questionnaire assessing the wider impacts of chronic pain on work. MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO, and CINAHL were searched for studies that included quantitative measures of the impact of chronic pain on work and for qualitative studies where individuals described impacts of their chronic pain on work. Quantitative measures, and text from qualitative studies, were analysed thematically. A thematic framework was developed for establishing the types of impacts measured or described in the literature. Forty-four quantitative and 16 qualitative papers were identified. The literature described impacts within 5 areas: changes at work and to working status; aspects of the workplace and work relationships; pain and related symptoms at work; psychological factors; and factors and impacts outside the work environment related to work. Quantitative measures mainly assessed impacts related to the quantity and quality of work (29 of 42 measures). Seventeen aspects were only discussed within the qualitative literature. This study identifies a discrepancy between the impacts that have been the focus of quantitative measures and the range that individuals working with chronic pain experience and highlights the need for a new measure assessing a wider range of issues.

Funder

Medical Research Council

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3