Effect of exposure-based vs traditional cognitive behavior therapy for fibromyalgia: a two-site single-blind randomized controlled trial

Author:

Hedman-Lagerlöf Maria1ORCID,Gasslander Nils2,Ahnlund Hoffmann Alice1,Bragesjö Maria1,Etzell Amanda2,Ezra Simon2,Frostell Elsa3,Hedman-Lagerlöf Erik34,Ivert Caroline3,Liliequist Björn3,Ljótsson Brjánn3,Hoppe Johanna M.2,Palmgren Josefin3,Spansk Edward2,Sundström Felicia2,Särnholm Josefin3,Tzavara Georgia2,Buhrman Monica2,Axelsson Erland567

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden

2. Division of Clinical Psychology, Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

3. Division of Psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

4. Gustavsberg Primary Health Care Center, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden

5. Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

6. Liljeholmen Primary Health Care Center, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden

7. Academic Primary Health Care Center, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden

Abstract

Abstract Fibromyalgia is a debilitating pain condition for which treatment effects are typically modest. The most evaluated psychological treatment is traditional cognitive behavior therapy (T-CBT), but promising effects have recently been seen in exposure-based cognitive behavior therapy (Exp-CBT). We investigated whether Exp-CBT was superior to T-CBT in a randomized controlled trial. Self-referred participants with fibromyalgia (N = 274) were randomized (1:1) to 10 weeks of Exp-CBT or T-CBT. Treatments were delivered online and presented as “CBT for fibromyalgia.” Participants were assessed at baseline, weekly during treatment, posttreatment, and at 6- and 12-month follow-up. Primary outcome was the difference in reduction in fibromyalgia severity as measured using the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) over 11 assessment points from baseline to posttreatment, modelled within an intention-to-treat framework using linear mixed effects models fitted on multiple imputed data. Approximately 91% of weekly FIQ scores were collected over the main phase. There was no significant difference between Exp-CBT and T-CBT in the mean reduction of fibromyalgia severity from pretreatment to posttreatment (b = 1.3, 95% CI −3.0 to 5.7, P = 0.544, d = −0.10). Minimal clinically important improvement was seen 60% in Exp-CBT vs 59% in T-CBT. Effects were sustained up to 12 months posttreatment. This well-powered randomized trial indicated that Exp-CBT was not superior to T-CBT for fibromyalgia. Both treatments were associated with a marked reduction in fibromyalgia severity, and the online treatment format might be of high clinical utility. T-CBT can still be regarded a reference standard treatment that remains clinically relevant when compared to novel treatment approaches.

Funder

Riksbankens Jubileumsfond

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Neurology (clinical),Neurology

Reference52 articles.

1. Lix and Rix—variations on a little-known readability index;Anderson;J Reading,1983

2. Effect of internet vs face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for health anxiety: a randomized noninferiority clinical trial;Axelsson;JAMA Psychiatry,2020

3. Minimal clinically important difference in the fibromyalgia impact questionnaire;Bennett;J Rheumatol,2009

4. The Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ): a review of its development, current version, operating characteristics and uses;Bennett;Clin Exp Rheumatol,2005

5. Cognitive behavioural therapies for fibromyalgia;Bernardy;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2013

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3