Effectiveness of neural mobilisation for the treatment of nerve-related cervicobrachial pain: a systematic review with subgroup meta-analysis

Author:

Lascurain-Aguirrebeña Ion12ORCID,Dominguez Laura3,Villanueva-Ruiz Iker34,Ballesteros Javier567ORCID,Rueda-Etxeberria Mikel5,Rueda Jose-Ramón3ORCID,Casado-Zumeta Xabat4,Araolaza-Arrieta Maialen4,Arbillaga-Etxarri Ane4,Tampin Brigitte8910ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Physiology, Physiotherapy Area, Faculty of Medicine and Nursing, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Leioa, Spain

2. Biodonostia Health Research Institute, Bioengineering Area, Innovación Group, San Sebastián, Spain

3. Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Nursing, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Leioa, Spain

4. Deusto Physical TherapIker Group, Physical Therapy Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Deusto, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain

5. Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain

6. Department of Neurosciences, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Leioa, Spain

7. Ciber Mental Health (CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain

8. Department of Physiotherapy, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia

9. Curtin School of Allied Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia

10. Faculty of Business and Social Sciences, Hochschule Osnabrueck, University of Applied Sciences, Osnabrueck, Germany

Abstract

Abstract Neural mobilisations (NM) have been advocated for the treatment of nerve-related cervicobrachial pain; however, it is unclear what types of patients with nerve-related cervicobrachial pain (if any) may benefit. Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, PeDro, Cinahl, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception until December 2022. Randomised controlled trials were included if they assessed the effectiveness of NM in nerve-related cervicobrachial pain, and outcome measures were pain intensity and/or disability. Studies were classified according to their inclusion/exclusion criteria as radiculopathy, Wainner cluster, Hall, and Elvey cluster or other. Meta-analyses with subgroup analyses were performed. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane Rob2 tool. Twenty-seven studies were included. For pain and disability reduction, NM was found to be more effective than no treatment (pooled pain mean difference [MD] = −2.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] = −3.81 to −1.81; pooled disability standardized mean difference = −1.55, 95% CI = −2.72 to −0.37), increased the effectiveness of standard physiotherapy as an adjuvant when compared with standard physiotherapy alone (pooled pain MD = −1.44, 95% CI = −1.98 to −0.89; pooled disability MD = −11.07, 95% CI = −16.38 to −5.75) but was no more effective than cervical traction (pooled pain MD = −0.33, 95% CI = −1.35 to 0.68; pooled disability MD = −10.09, 95% CI = −21.89 to 1.81). For disability reduction, NM was found to be more effective than exercise (pooled MD = −18.27, 95% CI = −20.29 to −17.44). In most comparisons, there were significant differences in the effectiveness of NM between the subgroups. Neural mobilisations was consistently more effective than all alternative interventions (no treatment, traction, exercise, and standard physiotherapy alone) in 13 studies classified as Wainner cluster. PROSPERO registration: CRD42022376087.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Neurology (clinical),Neurology

Reference90 articles.

1. Comparison of effectiveness of upper quarter neurodynamic treatment and cervical traction in cervical radiculopathy: a pilot study;Abhilash;Indian J Physiother Occup Ther,2018

2. Multimodal intervention of high-intensity laser with neurodynamic mobilization in cervical radiculopathy;Abu Shady;Pakistan J Med Health Sci,2021

3. A randomized clinical trial of manual therapy for cervico-brachial pain syndrome—a pilot study;Allison;Man Ther,2002

4. Effectiveness of neurodynamics in comparison to manual traction in the management of cervical radiculopathy;Anwar;Int J Physiother,2016

5. Effectiveness of neuromobilization in patients with cervical rediculopathy;Anwar;Rawal Med J,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3