Author:
Admon Lindsay K.,Daw Jamie R.,Interrante Julia D.,Ibrahim Bridget Basile,Millette Maya J.,Kozhimannil Katy B.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
To measure insurance coverage at prepregnancy, birth, and postpartum, and insurance coverage continuity across these periods among rural and urban U.S. residents.
METHODS:
We performed a pooled, cross-sectional analysis of survey data from 154,992 postpartum individuals in 43 states and two jurisdictions that participated in the 2016–2019 PRAMS (Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System). We calculated unadjusted estimates of insurance coverage (Medicaid, commercial, or uninsured) during three periods (prepregnancy, birth, and postpartum), as well as insurance continuity across these periods among rural and urban U.S. residents. We conducted subgroup analyses to compare uninsurance rates among rural and urban residents by sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. We used logistic regression models to generate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for each comparison.
RESULTS:
Rural residents experienced greater odds of uninsurance in each period and continuous uninsurance across all three periods, compared with their urban counterparts. Uninsurance was higher among rural residents compared with urban residents during prepregnancy (15.4% vs 12.1%; aOR 1.19, 95% CI 1.11–1.28], at birth (4.6% vs 2.8%; aOR 1.60, 95% CI 1.41–1.82), and postpartum (12.7% vs 9.8%, aOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.17–1.38]. In each period, rural residents who were non-Hispanic White, married, and with intended pregnancies experienced greater adjusted odds of uninsurance compared with their urban counterparts. Rural–urban differences in uninsurance persisted across both Medicaid expansion and non–expansion states, and among those with varying levels of education and income. Rural inequities in perinatal coverage were experienced by Hispanic, English-speaking, and Indigenous individuals during prepregnancy and at birth.
CONCLUSION:
Perinatal uninsurance disproportionately affects rural residents, compared with urban residents, in the 43 states examined. Differential insurance coverage may have important implications for addressing rural–urban inequities in maternity care access and maternal health.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Reference30 articles.
1. Access to obstetric services in rural counties still declining, with 9 percent losing services, 2004–14;Hung;Health Aff (Millwood),2017
2. Association between loss of hospital-based obstetric services and birth outcomes in rural counties in the United States;Kozhimannil;JAMA,2018
3. Changes in hospital-based obstetric services in rural US counties, 2014-2018;Kozhimannil;JAMA,2020
4. Rural-urban differences in severe maternal morbidity and mortality in the US, 2007–15;Kozhimannil;Health Aff (Millwood),2019
5. Urban-rural differences in pregnancy-related deaths, United States, 2011-2016;Merkt;Am J Obstet Gynecol,2021
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献