Author:
Erden Murat,Gayete-Lafuente Sonia,Vural Nazli Aylin,Oktay Kutluk H.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
To evaluate the utility, success, and safety of ovarian tissue cryopreservation and autologous cryopreserved ovarian tissue transplantation for fertility preservation in patients with gynecologic cancers.
DATA SOURCES:
A comprehensive search was performed of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library databases to identify relevant studies on the utility and outcomes of ovarian tissue cryopreservation and autologous cryopreserved ovarian tissue transplantation for gynecologic cancers from inception until January 23, 2024.
METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION:
Two reviewers independently performed the study selection, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment, and the results were then reviewed together. Twenty-three studies were included in the current systematic review.
TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS:
The resultant data were meta-analyzed to produce a pooled-effect estimate of the utility of ovarian tissue cryopreservation and autologous transplantation in gynecologic cancers as a proportion of all indications. We found that 7.5% and 9.6% of women undergoing ovarian tissue cryopreservation and autologous transplantation, respectively, had gynecologic cancers. In comparison, hematologic malignancies and breast cancer accounted for approximately 66.0% of all indications for these procedures. The return rate for autologous cryopreserved ovarian tissue transplantation in gynecologic cancers (6.0%) was not statistically different from those for other indications. Among women with gynecologic cancer who underwent ovarian stimulation, 27.3% had at least one child, and the ovarian endocrine function was restored in 78.1% of the women after autologous transplantation. The median graft longevity was 32 months, and no graft-site recurrence was reported after autologous transplantation in women with gynecologic cancer.
CONCLUSION:
Our results suggest that ovarian tissue cryopreservation and autologous transplantation are feasible options for preserving ovarian function in women with gynecologic cancers, although ovarian tissue cryopreservation is underutilized, and further studies are needed to determine the longer-term outcomes of autologous transplantation.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION:
PROSPERO, CRD42024498522.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)