The Isabel Differential Diagnosis Generator for Orbital Diagnosis

Author:

Ing Edsel B.12,Balas Michael2,Nassrallah Georges1,DeAngelis Dan1,Nijhawan Navdeep1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, University of Toronto Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Canada

2. Department of Ophthalmolgoy and Vision Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

Abstract

Purpose: The Isabel differential diagnosis generator is one of the most widely known electronic diagnosis decision support tools. The authors prospectively evaluated the utility of Isabel for orbital disease differential diagnosis. Methods: The terms “proptosis,” “lid retraction,” “orbit inflammation,” “orbit tumour,” “orbit tumor, infiltrative” and “orbital tumor, well-circumscribed” were separately input into Isabel and the results were tabulated. Then the clinical details (patient age, gender, signs, symptoms, and imaging findings) of 25 orbital cases from a textbook of orbital surgery were entered into Isabel. The top 10 differential diagnoses generated by Isabel were compared with the correct diagnosis. Results: Isabel identified hyperthyroidism and Graves ophthalmopathy as the leading causes of lid retraction, but many common causes of proptosis and orbital tumors were not correctly elucidated. Of the textbook cases, Isabel correctly identified 4/25 (16%) of orbital cases as one of its top 10 differential diagnoses, and the median rank of the correct diagnosis was 6/10. Thirty-two percent of the output diagnoses were unlikely to cause orbital disease. Conclusion: Isabel is currently of limited value in the mainstream orbital differential diagnosis. The incorporation of anatomic localizations and imaging findings may help increase the accuracy of orbital diagnosis.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Ophthalmology,General Medicine,Surgery

Reference10 articles.

1. Medical error-the third leading cause of death in the US.;Makary;BMJ,2016

2. Estimating deaths due to medical error: the ongoing controversy and why it matters.;Shojania;BMJ Qual Saf,2017

3. Improving diagnosis in health care—the next imperative for patient safety.;Singh;N Engl J Med,2015

4. The effectiveness of electronic differential diagnoses (DDX) generators: a systematic review and meta-analysis.;Riches;PLoS One,2016

5. Diagnostic decision support in ophthalmology.;Odufuwa;J Telemed Telecare,2007

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3