Buffered Versus Nonbuffered Local Anesthetics and Local Pain Scores in Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty: Randomized Controlled Trial

Author:

Vasović Dolika D.1,Karamarković Miodrag2,Stojičić Milan23,Jovanović Milan23,Savić Vujović Katarina34,Rašić Dejan13,Colić Milan5,Musić Nikola5

Affiliation:

1. Eye Hospital University Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia

2. Clinic for Burns, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia

3. Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia

4. Department of Pharmacology, Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Belgrade, Serbia

5. Colic Hospital, Belgrade, Serbia

Abstract

Purpose: This split-face study aimed to see whether different types of local anesthetics or their buffered/nonbuffered combinations produce lower pain scores in upper eyelid blepharoplasty. Methods: The study involved 288 patients, randomly divided into 9 groups: 1) 2% lidocaine with epinephrine—Lid + Epi; 2) 2% lidocaine with epinephrine and 0.5% bupivacaine (1:1)—Lid + Epi + Bupi; 3) 2% lidocaine with 0.5% bupivacaine (1:1)—Lid + Bupi; 4) 0.5% bupivacaine—Bupi; 5) 2% lidocaine—Lid; 6) 4% articaine hydrochloride with epinephrine—Art + Epi; 7) buffered 2% lidocaine/epinephrine with sodium bicarbonate (SB) in a 3:1 ratio—Lid + Epi + SB; 8) buffered 2% lidocaine with SB in a 3:1 ratio—Lid + SB; 9) buffered 4% articaine hydrochloride/epinephrine with SB in a 3:1 ratio—Art + Epi + SB. Following the injection of the first eyelid and a 5-minute period of soft pressure on the injection site, patients were asked to rate their pain level on the Wong-Baker Face Pain Rating Visual Analogue Scale. Rating of the pain level was repeated 15 and 30 minutes following anesthetic administration. Results: The lowest pain scores at the first time point were observed in Lid + SB when compared with all of the other groups (p < 0.05). At the final time point, significantly lower scores were also observed in Lid + SB, Lid + Epi + SB, and Art + Epi + SB when compared with the Lid + Epi group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: These findings could help surgeons select an appropriate combination of local anesthetics, particularly in patients with lower pain threshold and tolerance because buffered combinations of local anesthetics produce significantly lower pain scores compared with nonbuffered solutions.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Ophthalmology,General Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3