Is Blepharoplasty Cost-effective? Utility Analysis of Dermatochalasis and Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty

Author:

Lee Tonya C.1ORCID,Fung Sammie E.1,Hu Jenny Q.2,Villatoro George A.2,Park Kathryn S.1,Fung Brian M.3,Groessl Erik J.45,Korn Bobby S.67,Kikkawa Don O.67,Liu Catherine Y.26

Affiliation:

1. Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California, U.S.A.

2. Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, UC San Diego, San Diego, California, U.S.A.

3. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Arizona College of Medicine – Phoenix, Phoenix, Arizona, U.S.A.

4. Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health, La Jolla, California, U.S.A.

5. Department of Behavioral Science, UC San Diego Health Services Research Center, San Diego, California, U.S.A.

6. Division of Oculofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Ophthalmology, UC San Diego

7. Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California, U.S.A.

Abstract

Purpose: This cross-sectional prospective study measured utility values of upper eyelid dermatochalasis to quantify its impact on quality of life and assess cost-effectiveness of upper blepharoplasty. Methods: Utility of dermatochalasis was assessed using the standard reference gamble and time trade-off methods, with dual anchor points of perfect eye function and perfect health. The utility value obtained was used to create a Markov model and run a cost-effectiveness analysis of blepharoplasty as a treatment for dermatochalasis while utilizing the societal perspective. Results: One hundred three patients with dermatochalasis recruited from an urban outpatient ophthalmology clinic completed the utility survey. The authors determined utility values for dermatochalasis ranging from 0.74 to 0.92 depending on the measurement method (standard reference gamble/time trade-off) and anchor points. The cost-effectiveness analysis yielded an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $3,146 per quality-adjusted life year, well under the conventional willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000 per quality-adjusted life year. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis with Monte Carlo simulation demonstrated that blepharoplasty would be cost-effective in 88.1% of cases at this willingness-to-pay threshold. Conclusions: Dermatochalasis has an impact on quality of life that is significantly associated with level of perceived functional impairment. Rising health care costs have underscored the importance of providing value-based treatment to patients, and the results of this study suggest that blepharoplasty is a cost-effective treatment option for symptomatic bilateral upper eyelid dermatochalasis.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference52 articles.

1. The impact of anchor point on utilities for 5 common ophthalmic diseases.;Lee;Ophthalmology,2008

2. Utility values and age-related macular degeneration.;Brown;Arch Ophthalmol,2000

3. A systematic literature review of utility weights in wet age-related macular degeneration.;Pearson;J Med Econ,2013

4. Impact of neurotrophic keratopathy on quality of life: a utility study.;Fung;Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,2021

5. Dermatochalasis.;DeAngelis;Int Ophthalmol Clin,2002

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3