Prevention of Carotid Angioplasty-induced Bradycardia and Hypotension with Temporary Venous Pacemakers

Abstract

Abstract OBJECTIVE Carotid angioplasty with stent placement is becoming an established treatment modality for patients with high-risk carotid stenosis. Unlike carotid endarterectomy, angioplasty causes direct mechanical dilation of the stenotic carotid artery and bulb. Stimulation of the sinus baroreceptors induces a reflexive response that consists of increased parasympathetic discharge and inhibition of sympathetic tone, which results in bradycardia and subsequent cardiogenic hypotension. METHODS At a single institution, the experience with 43 patients treated from November 1994 to January 2000 with 47 angioplasty and stent procedures for occlusive carotid artery disease was retrospectively reviewed. Prophylactic temporary venous pacemakers were used to prevent hypotension from possible angioplasty-induced bradycardia. Pacemakers were set to capture a heart rate decrease below 60 beats per minute. Variables analyzed included demographics, etiology of disease, side of the lesion, the presence of symptoms, history of coronary artery disease, percent stenosis, type of stent used, number of dilations, pressure of dilation, and angioplasty balloon diameter. RESULTS Ten patients were excluded because pacemakers were not used during their angioplasty procedures, and these included three emergencies and a lesion that was unrelated anatomically to the carotid sinus (petrous carotid). The remaining 37 procedures were performed in 33 patients with a mean age of 67 years, and consisted of 17 men, 16 women, 20 right and 17 left-sided lesions. The pacemakers maintained a cardiac rhythm in 23 (62%) of the 37 procedures and in no case did the pacemaker fail to respond when activated. Recurrent (56%; 10 of 18), radiation-induced (78%; 7 of 9), and medically refractory carotid stenosis (67%; 6 of 9) required intraprocedural pacing. Two patients with recurrent stenosis became hypotensive despite the aid of the pacing device but were not symptomatic. Seventy-nine percent (15 of 19) of symptomatic lesions and 57% (8 of 14) of nonsymptomatic lesions required pacing, which was statistically significant (P = 0.049). No patient experienced an operative morbidity or mortality as a consequence of the temporary pacing devices. CONCLUSION Angioplasty-induced bradycardia is a common condition, and it is more prevalent in radiation-induced stenosis and with symptomatic lesions. Temporary venous demand pacing is a safe procedure and may prevent life-threatening, baroreceptor-induced hypotension.