Prognostic value of maximum standard uptake value, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with renal carcinoma-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Prognostic value of maximum standard uptake value, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with renal carcinoma

Published:2020-05-15 Issue:20 Volume:99 Page:e19988
ISSN:0025-7974
Container-title:Medicine
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Xuan Dongchun,Wen Weibo,Tian Shengri,Piao Minhu,Xu Dongyuan,Liu Lan

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference18 articles.

1. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics;Miller;CA Cancer J Clin,2016

2. Medroxyprogesterone, interferon alfa-2a, interleukin 2, or combination of both cytokines in patients with metastatic renal carcinoma of intermediate prognosis: results of a randomized controlled trial;Negrier;Cancer,2010

3. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement;Moher D.;Ann Intern Med,2009

4. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis in head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Pak;J Nucl Med Jun,2014

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Evaluating therapeutic efficacy of extended shelf-life 90Y glass microspheres in transarterial radioembolization for colorectal cancer: a quantitative FDG PET/CT analysis;Nuclear Medicine Communications;2024-01-12

2. Diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in primary and metastatic renal tumors: a pilot study;Clinical and Translational Imaging;2023-09-14

3. Prognostic significance of 18F-FDG PET/CT indices in metastatic renal cell cancer and evaluation of revised IMDC risk model by including 18F-FDG PET-CT parameters;Acta Radiologica;2022-11-29

4. Prognostic value of maximum standard uptake value, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with renal carcinoma: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis: Erratum;Medicine;2022-09-30

5. The Diagnostic Performance of Maximum Uptake Value and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Ovarian or Adnexal Masses: A Meta-Analysis;Frontiers in Oncology;2022-02-09