Incarcerated Men

Author:

MacLennan Duncan Stewart1,Mayan Maria2,Kunyk Diane1,Lasiuk Gerri3

Affiliation:

1. Author Affiliations:Faculty of Nursing and

2. School of Public Health, University of Alberta

3. College of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Individuals experiencing pain while incarcerated depend on nurses, security structures, processes, and regulations for relief. Purpose The intent of this research was to understand men's experience of pain during incarceration to inform correctional nursing practice. Method Interpretive description, co-positioned with relational ethics, guided this study. Twelve incarcerated men participated in a single 1-hour interview that was audio-recorded and transcribed. The resultant text was analyzed for themes. Findings The two main themes were dependence on staff and institutional processes and dependence on oneself and others who were incarcerated. Participants reported a substantial loss in their ability to access pain-relieving medications, products, and services. Unresponsive or delayed pain-relieving interventions from nurses contributed to their sense of indignity, disrespect, and injustice. The participants employed whatever was available, mainly exercise equipment and social support, to manage their pain. Discussion Nurses must engage with incarcerated patients meaningfully to understand and respond to contextual factors that influence their pain experiences. Participants identified loss of autonomy and dependence on nurses as barriers to their pain relief. Conclusion Nurse engagement and responsiveness are crucial to altering incarcerated men's perceptions of injustice or helplessness while improving their pain experiences. Nurses must also foster autonomous pain-management approaches that men can use without limitations within correctional settings.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Law,Nursing (miscellaneous),Psychiatry and Mental health,General Medicine,Pshychiatric Mental Health,Pathology and Forensic Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3