Increasing Sexual Violence Reporting and Disclosure in Higher Education Institutions

Author:

Kennedy Karen1,Malinen KelleyAnne2,Gunn Virginia

Affiliation:

1. Author Affiliations:School of Nursing, Cape Breton University

2. Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Mount Saint Vincent University

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aims This article explores the underreporting of sexual violence (SV) in higher education, highlighting serious implications for survivors who may silently cope with its aftermath instead of accessing crucial resources. Methods We utilize Bolman and Deal's four-frame model for organizational change to assess how internal factors within organizations may influence reporting of SV. The four frames—symbolic, structural, human resources, and political—offer a systematic analysis of the internal organizational context in higher education institutions concerning SV reporting. Results Our suggested approach offers concrete dimensions and probing questions for examination. Derived from a qualitative study, our recommendations align with Bolman and Deal's four-frame model, aiding in assessing the organizational environment. This approach assists stakeholders in identifying barriers/facilitators in the internal organizational context of higher education institutions, enabling effective planning for improved SV reporting/disclosure. Conclusions A thorough analysis is essential for understanding factors influencing campus SV reporting. Our proposed critical analysis and recommendations serve as a starting point to identify organizational barriers/facilitators, informing the revision of SV policies and processes, including reporting. Potential Impact of Improved Sexual Assault Reporting in Higher Education Institutions on Forensic Nursing and Survivors/Victims' Allies Enhanced reporting of sexual assault in higher education benefits forensic nurses and allies, like student affairs, advocacy groups, unions, SV coordinators, health centers, equity departments, human rights officers, and administration. Improved analysis of institutional and cultural contexts allows for tailored services to better meet survivors' needs. Increased reporting should lead institutions to higher service utilization, requiring careful planning for resource allocation.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference41 articles.

1. “I never told anyone until the #metoo movement”: What can we learn from sexual abuse and sexual assault disclosures made through social media?;Child Abuse & Neglect,2020

2. Role of blame and rape-related shame in distress among rape victims;Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice and Policy,2023

3. ‘Wasting talent’? Gender and the problematics of academic disenchantment and disengagement with leadership;Higher Education Research & Development,2014

4. Prevention of sexual violence among college students: Current challenges and future directions;Journal of American College Health,2022

5. Ridding the he-said-she-said dichotomy: The deep entanglement of sexual violence on college campuses student notes;American Journal of Trial Advocacy,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3