Reproductive Coercion Among Women With Disabilities

Author:

Amos Vanessa1,Lyons Genevieve R.2,Laughon Kathryn1,Hughes Rosemary B.3,Alhusen Jeanne L.1

Affiliation:

1. Author Affiliations:University of Virginia School of Nursing

2. University of Virginia Public Health Sciences

3. University of Montana Rural Institute for Inclusive Communities.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background/Aims Reproductive coercion (RC) is a widespread yet understudied type of intimate partner violence that is associated with numerous negative outcomes. Women with disabilities may be at an increased risk of RC; however, little research has been conducted among this population. Using population-based data, we sought to examine the prevalence of RC in postpartum women with disabilities. Methods This is a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional survey, the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, a nationally representative survey conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in partnership with participating states. These analyses include 3,117 respondents who had information on both disability status and experiences of RC. Results Approximately 1.9% of respondents reported experiencing RC (95% CI [1.3, 2.4]). When stratified by disability status, approximately 1.7% of respondents without a disability reported RC whereas 6.2% of respondents with at least one disability reported RC (p < 0.001). In univariable logistic models, disability, age, education, relationship status, income, and race were all significantly associated with RC. Conclusions Our findings highlight the need for healthcare providers working with women with disabilities to screen for RC and potentially uncover intimate partner violence and prevent its negative health consequences. All states participating in Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System data collection are urged to incorporate measures of RC and disability status to better address this significant issue.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Law,Nursing (miscellaneous),Psychiatry and Mental health,General Medicine,Pshychiatric Mental Health,Pathology and Forensic Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Reference34 articles.

1. Committee Opinion No. 518

2. Committee Opinion No. 554

3. “They didn't ask.” Rural women with disabilities and experiences of violence describe interactions with the healthcare system;Qualitative Health Research,2022

4. Reproductive coercion and childbearing motivations among adolescent and young adult women recently diagnosed with pelvic inflammatory disease;Journal of Adolescent Health,2018

5. Associations between reproductive coercion, partner violence, and mental health symptoms among young black women in Baltimore, Maryland;Journal of Interpersonal Violence,2021

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3