Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Propofol Microemulsion and Lipid Emulsion after an Intravenous Bolus and Variable Rate Infusion

Author:

Kim Kye-Min1,Choi Byung-Moon2,Park Si-Won2,Lee Soo-Han3,Christensen Lane V.4,Zhou Jiaye5,Yoo Byung-Hoon1,Shin Hye-Won6,Bae Kyun-Seop7,Kern Steven E.8,Kang Sung-Hong9,Noh Gyu-Jeong10

Affiliation:

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

2. Resident, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine.

3. Postdoctoral Fellow.

4. Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Chemistry.

5. Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah.

6. Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Korea University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

7. Assistant Professor, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

8. Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Chemistry and Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah College of Pharmacy, Salt Lake City, Utah.

9. Associate Professor, School of Health Administration, Inje University, Kimhae, Korea.

10. Professor, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine.

Abstract

Background The aim of this trial was to evaluate the induction and recovery characteristics of microemulsion propofol (Aquafol; Daewon Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea). Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety profile were investigated. Lipid emulsion propofol (Diprivan; AstraZeneca, London, United Kingdom) was used as a comparator. Methods Thirty-one healthy volunteers aged 20-79 yr were given an intravenous bolus of propofol 2 mg/kg, followed by variable rate infusion for 60 min. Each volunteer was studied twice with different formulations at an interval of 1 week. Arterial concentrations of propofol were measured, and Bispectral Index was used as a surrogate measure of propofol effect. The induction and recovery characteristics including bioequivalence were evaluated by noncompartmental analysis. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were investigated using a population approach with mixed effects modeling. The rate, severity, and causal relation of adverse events were analyzed. Results Both formulations were bioequivalent. The observed time to peak effect after a bolus of both formulations was 1.5 min. Plasma concentration of propofol at loss of consciousness, time to loss of consciousness after a bolus, and time to recovery of consciousness after discontinuation of infusion did not show significant differences. The population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics revealed a variety of differences between two formulations. Aquafol showed similar safety profile to Diprivan. Conclusions The efficacy and safety of Aquafol were not different from those of Diprivan within the dose range in this study.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Reference21 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3