Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol on Lower Esophageal Sphincter and Gastroesophageal Pressure Gradient in Healthy Volunteers

Author:

Turan Alparslan1,Wo John2,Kasuya Yusuke3,Govinda Raghavendra4,Akça Ozan5,Dalton Jarrod E.6,Sessler Daniel I.7,Rauch Stefan8

Affiliation:

1. Staff Anesthesiologist.

2. Professor, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.

3. Research Fellow, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, and the Outcomes Research Consortium, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky. Current position: Attending Anesthesiologist, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.

4. Clinical/Research Fellow, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky. Current position: Fellow in Cardiac Anesthesia, Department of Anesthesiology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

5. Associate Professor.

6. Biostatistician, Departments of Quantitative Health Sciences and Outcomes Research, The Cleveland Clinic.

7. Professor and Chair, Department of Outcomes Research.

8. Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, and the Outcomes Research Consortium, Louisville, Kentucky.

Abstract

Background Many anesthetics reduce lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP). Reduced pressure and consequent reduction in the gastroesophageal pressure gradient (GEPG) thus promotes gastroesophageal reflux and may contribute to aspiration pneumonia and associated morbidity. Therefore, the authors compared LESP and GEPG during dexmedetomidine and propofol sedation. Methods Using a randomized, double-blind, crossover design, 11 healthy volunteers were sedated on 2 separate days. Baseline LESP and GEPG were recorded each day. Subsequently, on each day volunteers received three 40-min-long sedative infusions of increasing doses of 0.6, 1.2, and 2.4 ng/ml dexmedetomidine or 1, 2, and 4 microg/ml propofol. LESP and GEPG were recorded during inhalation and expiration at 20 and 40 min after starting each infusion phase, and these measurements were averaged. Results are presented as mean (95% confidence interval). Results Two subjects did not return for the dexmedetomidine study day, and the dexmedetomidine results were unusable in another; propofol results in these volunteers were nonetheless retained for analysis. There were no significant differences in LESP and GEPG as a function of drug. However, there was a small but significant 7.4 (-1.6 to -13.2) mmHg (approximately 25%) dose-dependent decrease in LESP over the range of targeted low to high blood levels of each drug. Conclusions Both dexmedetomidine and propofol have similar effects on LESP and GEPG. Although both of the drugs cause some decrease in LESP at high concentrations, it is unlikely that this effect would promote gastroesophageal reflux during sedation.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Reference35 articles.

Cited by 27 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3