Author:
Traynor Jamie P.,Simpson Keith,Geddes Colin C.,Deighan Christopher J.,Fox Jonathan G.
Abstract
ABSTRACT. There is a trend to start dialysis earlier in patients with chronic renal failure. Studies that suggest improved survival from earlier initiation of dialysis are flawed in that they have measured survival from start of dialysis rather than from a time point before dialysis, when patients have the same renal function. This flaw is termed lead-time bias. Using the electronic patient record at the renal unit of Glasgow Royal Infirmary, all patients were identified who had received dialysis for chronic renal failure and who had sufficient data to calculate the time point at which they reached an estimated creatinine clearance (eCCr) of 20 ml/min (n= 275). This date was used to time survival. The patients were divided into early and late start groups by the median eCCrfor all patients at initiation of dialysis, which was 8.3 ml/min. There was no significant benefit in patient survival from earlier initiation of dialysis. A Cox proportional hazards model demonstrated a significant inverse relationship between eCCrat start of dialysis and survival (hazard ratio, 1.1;P= 0.02),i.e., patients who started dialysis with a lower eCCrtended to survive longer. This relationship retained significance when gender, age, weight, presence of diabetes, mode of first dialysis, initial dialysis access, hemoglobin, serum albumin, blood leukocyte count, Wright/Khan index, and eCCrat the start of dialysis were taken into account. This study fails to support a policy of earlier initiation of dialysis for patients with end-stage renal failure.
Publisher
American Society of Nephrology (ASN)
Subject
Nephrology,General Medicine
Cited by
211 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献