Exposure to Operative Anesthesia in Childhood and Subsequent Neurobehavioral Diagnoses: A Natural Experiment Using Appendectomy

Author:

Silber Jeffrey H.1ORCID,Rosenbaum Paul R.2ORCID,Reiter Joseph G.3ORCID,Jain Siddharth4ORCID,Hill Alexander S.5,Hashemi Sean6,Brown Sydney7ORCID,Olfson Mark8ORCID,Ing Caleb9ORCID

Affiliation:

1. 1Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Center for Outcomes Research, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

2. 2Department of Statistics and Data Science, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

3. 3Center for Outcomes Research, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

4. 4Center for Outcomes Research, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

5. 5Center for Outcomes Research, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

6. 6Center for Outcomes Research, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

7. 7Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

8. 8Departments of Psychiatry and Epidemiology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York.

9. 9Departments of Anesthesiology and Epidemiology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York.

Abstract

Background Observational studies of anesthetic neurotoxicity may be biased because children requiring anesthesia commonly have medical conditions associated with neurobehavioral problems. This study takes advantage of a natural experiment associated with appendicitis to determine whether anesthesia and surgery in childhood were specifically associated with subsequent neurobehavioral outcomes. Methods This study identified 134,388 healthy children with appendectomy and examined the incidence of subsequent externalizing or behavioral disorders (conduct, impulse control, oppositional defiant, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder) or internalizing or mood or anxiety disorders (depression, anxiety, or bipolar disorder) when compared to 671,940 matched healthy controls as identified in Medicaid data between 2001 and 2018. For comparison, this study also examined 154,887 otherwise healthy children admitted to the hospital for pneumonia, cellulitis, and gastroenteritis, of which only 8% received anesthesia, and compared them to 774,435 matched healthy controls. In addition, this study examined the difference-in-differences between matched appendectomy patients and their controls and matched medical admission patients and their controls. Results Compared to controls, children with appendectomy were more likely to have subsequent behavioral disorders (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.06; P = 0.0010) and mood or anxiety disorders (hazard ratio, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.17; P < 0.0001). Relative to controls, children with medical admissions were also more likely to have subsequent behavioral (hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.18 to 1.22; P < 0.0001) and mood or anxiety (hazard ratio, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.23 to 1.27; P < 0.0001) disorders. Comparing the difference between matched appendectomy patients and their matched controls to the difference between matched medical patients and their matched controls, medical patients had more subsequent neurobehavioral problems than appendectomy patients. Conclusions Although there is an association between neurobehavioral diagnoses and appendectomy, this association is not specific to anesthesia exposure and is stronger in medical admissions. Medical admissions, generally without anesthesia exposure, displayed significantly higher rates of these disorders than appendectomy-exposed patients. Editor’s Perspective What We Already Know About This Topic What This Article Tells Us That Is New

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3