Comparing the incidence of postoperative painful bladder spasm between malecot catheter and 3-way Foley catheter: a clinical trial

Author:

Farahani Mojtaba1,Dehghani Keramat2,Shojaei Parisa34

Affiliation:

1. General Practitioner, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2. Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

3. Department of Community & Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

4. Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Tehran Islamic Azad University of Medical Sciences,Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Background: In this study, the effect of Pezzer (as a Pezzer catheter) and three-way Foley catheters, used for suprapubic catheterization after open prostatectomy, was investigated in terms of early incidence of painful bladder spasms. Materials and methods: In this single-blind clinical trial study, 160 patients diagnosed with LUTS/BPH were placed in two groups of 80 Pezzer catheter (Pezzer(size 28)) and three-way Foley catheters (size 24) for suprapubic catheterization. The evaluated variables in this study are age, prostate weight, narcotics dose, Spasm frequency, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), visual analogue scale (VAS), catheterization period. Results: The frequency of spasm in Foley group was significantly lower (4.4±7.26 vs. 6.28±4.4; P value=0.000). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the frequency of dysuria (P value=0.3). Conclusion: The findings of our study showed that despite slightly favourable results in using suprapubic Foley catheter compared to Pezzer catheters in patients with open prostatectomy in terms of pain and spasm frequency, there was no significant difference between the use of these two types of catheters.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3