Differences in treatment and outcomes among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with and without standard modifiable risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Shrestha Biraj1ORCID,Shrestha Dhan B.2,Sedhai Yub R.3,Shtembari Jurgen2,Oli Prakash R.4ORCID,Shikhrakar Shreeja5ORCID,Paudel Bidhya6,Roberts Madhur7,Patel Nimesh K.8,Singh Aniruddha9ORCID,Singh Karan3ORCID,Waheed Irfan3,Basnyat Soney10,Khan Mohammad S.11,Kazimuddin Mohammed11,Elgendy Islam Y.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Internal Medicine, Tower Health Program

2. Department of Internal Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Chicago

3. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary Disease and Critical Care, University of Kentucky College of Medicine-Bowling Green Campus, Bowling Green, Kentucky

4. Department of Internal Medicine, Province Hospital, Birendranagar, Surkhet

5. Department of Internal Medicine, Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences, Dhulikhel, Kavrepalanchok, Nepal

6. Department of Internal Medicine, AMITA Health, Ascension Saint Francis, Evanston, Illinois

7. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana

8. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, VCU Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA

9. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Tower Health Program, West Reading, Pennsylvania

10. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky College of Medicine-Bowling Green Campus

11. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine-Bowling Green Campus, Bowling Green

12. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gill Heart Institute, University of Kentucky, Lexington

Abstract

Background: There are limited data available on outcomes and pathophysiology behind ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in populations without standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRFs). The authors carried out this meta-analysis to understand the differences in treatment and outcomes of STEMI patients with and without SMuRFs. Methods: A systematic database search was performed for relevant studies. Studies reporting desired outcomes among STEMI patients with and without SMuRFs were selected based on predefined criteria in the study protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42022341389). Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts using Covidence. Full texts of the selected studies were independently reviewed to confirm eligibility. Data were extracted from all eligible studies via a full-text review of the primary article for qualitative and quantitative analysis. In-hospital mortality following the first episode of STEMI was the primary outcome, with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), repeat myocardial infarction (MI), cardiogenic shock, heart failure, and stroke as secondary outcomes of interest. Odds ratio (OR) with a 95% CI was used to estimate the effect. Results: A total of 2135 studies were identified from database search, six studies with 521 150 patients with the first STEMI episode were included in the analysis. The authors found higher in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.43; CI: 1.40–1.47) and cardiogenic shock (OR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.55–1.63) in the SMuRF-less group with no differences in MACE, recurrent MI, major bleeding, heart failure, and stroke. There were lower prescriptions of statin (OR: 0.62; CI: 0.42–0.91) and Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor /Angiotensin II receptor blocker (OR: 0.49; CI: 0.28–0.87) at discharge in SMuRF-less patients. There was no difference in procedures like coronary artery bypass graft, percutaneous coronary intervention, and thrombolysis. Conclusion: In the SMuRF-less STEMI patients, higher in-hospital mortality and treatment discrepancies were noted at discharge.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine,Surgery

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3