Neptune versus canister-based surgical waste management in Europe: results of the GREEN study

Author:

Baker Sarah1,Clark Julie1,Pla Angels B.2,Feixas Eulalia V.3,Huegel Julianne4,Tariq Luqman5

Affiliation:

1. NHS Friarage Hospital, Northallerton, UK

2. Hospital Germans Trias, Carretera De Canyet

3. Hospital Sant Pau, Carrer del Mas Casanovas, Barcelona, Spain

4. Stryker Instruments, Portage, Michigan, USA

5. Stryker European Regional Headquarters, Herikerbergweg, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Abstract

Background: Ineffective surgical fluid waste management in operating rooms (OR) creates a significant environmental burden, reduces OR efficiency, and adds physical challenges for surgical staff. There is a need for waste management systems that improve OR efficiency, safety, and sustainability. The GREEN study (Greening operating Rooms in EuropE comparing Neptune vs. canisters) was conducted to compare the impact of two fluid waste management systems. Materials and methods: This 2-arm, nonrandomized, prospective service evaluation of fluid waste extraction was conducted using observational time series and surveys. Fluid waste-related data were collected from routine urologic and orthopedic surgeries across three European hospital sites. The primary endpoint of waste disposal impact was the volume of treated waste after surgery (kilograms) using Stryker’s Neptune device (n=43) or canisters (n=41). The authors hypothesized that the surgical waste volume related to Neptune is less than the waste volume related to canisters. Secondary endpoints included time efficiency, user satisfaction, and staff ergonomics. Results: The total weight of device-related treated waste products was reduced by 98.5% when using Neptune (0.2±0.7 kg) compared with traditional canisters (13.2±16.6 kg; P<0.001). Decreased waste weight also translated to enhanced ergonomic safety for surgical staff, as Neptune reduced surgical fluid weight handled by staff by an average of 34 kg per procedure, a 96% reduction compared to canisters. Furthermore, the use of the Neptune system improved OR efficiency by reducing the number of staff required to manage the fluid suction device (P<0.001) and the time spent disposing of fluid waste (P<0.001). Conclusion: Stryker’s Neptune waste management system significantly reduces the volume of treated waste per surgery and improves OR efficiency, staff safety, and user satisfaction over the traditional canister system. This is a more eco-responsible approach to OR fluid waste management and could be considered in any healthcare establishment that generates fluid waste.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine,Surgery

Reference16 articles.

1. Greening of orthopedic surgery;Lee;Orthopedics,2012

2. Ecoresponsible actions in operating rooms: a health ecological and economic evaluation;Rouvière;Int J Surg,2022

3. Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic obstruction;Alexander;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2019

4. People, planet and profits: the case for greening operating rooms;Kagoma;CMAJ,2012

5. A review on medical waste management: treatment, recycling, and disposal options;Attrah;Environments,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3