Safety and Efficacy of Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection of Upper Gastrointestinal Lesions Using a Full Thickness Resection Device

Author:

Bomman Shivanand1,Klair Jagpal S.1,Canakis Andrew2,Muthusamy Arun Kumar3,Nagra Navroop4,Chandra Shruti5,Shanmugam Meena6,Perisetti Abhilash7,Aggarwal Avin8,Gavini Hemanth K.8,Krishnamoorthi Rajesh1

Affiliation:

1. Center for Digestive Health, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health

2. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD

3. Department of Gastroenterology, Cedar Valley Medical Specialists, Waterloo, IA

4. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY

5. Division of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

6. University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA

7. Parkview Cancer Institute, Fort Wayne, IN

8. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ

Abstract

Introduction: Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is a promising technique that allows for a minimally invasive resection of mucosal and submucosal lesions in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The data regarding the efficacy and safety of performing EFTR of upper GI lesions using a full-thickness resection device (FTRD) is limited. Hence, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the studies that evaluated this technique. Methods: We performed a comprehensive systematic search of multiple electronic databases and conference proceedings that reported outcomes of EFTR using the FTRD system. The weighted pooled rates of technical success, complete (R0) resection, adverse events (AE), and residual or recurrent lesions were analyzed with 95% CI using the random effects model. Results: Eight studies with a total of 139 patients who underwent EFTR of upper GI lesions were included in the study. The pooled, weighted rate of technical success was 88.2% (95% CI: 81.4-92.7%, I 2: 0). The R0 resection rate was 70.7% (95% CI: 62.5-77.8%, I 2: 0). Overall AE rates were 22.1% (95% CI: 15.8-30.1%, I 2: 0), however, most of the AEs were minor. Of the patients who had follow-up endoscopies, the residual and/or recurrent lesion rate was 6.1% (95% CI: 2.4-14.4%, I 2: 0). Heterogeneity in the analysis was low. Conclusions: EFTR using the FTRD seems to be effective and safe with acceptable R0 resection rates and low recurrence rates. Further prospective studies are required to validate our results and to compare various modalities of endoscopic resection with this single-step EFTR device.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Gastroenterology

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3