Efficacy and Safety of Radiofrequency Ablation Plus Stent Versus Stent-alone Treatments for Malignant Biliary Strictures

Author:

Khizar Hayat12ORCID,Hu Yufei3,Wu Yanhua3,Ali Kamran4,Iqbal Junaid5,Zulqarnain Muhammad1,Yang Jianfeng267

Affiliation:

1. Gastroenterology, International Education College of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou

2. Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine

3. Department of Gastroenterology, The Fourth School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University

4. Dermatology, International Education College of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University

5. Department of Metabolism and Endocrinology, National Clinical Research Center for Metabolic Diseases, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province

6. Key Laboratory of Clinical Cancer Pharmacology and Toxicology Research of Zhejiang Province

7. Key Laboratory of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine for Biliary and Pancreatic Diseases of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China

Abstract

Background/Aims: Malignant biliary strictures (MBS) are very aggressive and cannot be diagnosed in the early stages due to their asymptomatic nature. Stenting the stricture area of the biliary tree is palliative treatment but has poor survival time. Radiofrequency ablation plus stent (RFA+S) have been recently used to improve the survival and stent patency time in patients with MBS. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we tried to evaluate the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation. Materials and Methods: Study search up to December 2021 was performed in different medical databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane library, etc. We selected eligible studies reporting survival time, stent patency time, and adverse events in patients with MBS. We compare the outcomes of RFA+S and stent-alone treatment groups. Results: A total of 15 studies (6 randomized controlled trials and 9 observational studies) with 1815 patients were included for meta-analysis of which 701 patients were in RFA+S group and 1114 patients in the stent-alone group. Pooled mean difference of survival time was 2.88 months (95% CI: 1.78-3.97) and pooled mean difference of stent patency time was 2.11 months (95% CI: 0.91-3.30) and clinical success risk ratio was 1.05 (95% CI: 1.01–1.09). Risk ratios for adverse events are given; Bleeding 0.84 (95% CI: 0.34-2.11), abdominal pain 1.06 (95% CI: 0.79-1.40), pancreatitis 0.93 (95% CI: 0.43-2.01), cholangitis 1.07 (95% CI: 0.72-1.59), and stent dysfunction 0.87 (95% CI: 0.70-1.07). Conclusions: Radiofrequency ablation is involved in increased survival and stent patency time for MBS patients. With the help of better techniques, adverse events can be limited.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Gastroenterology

Reference43 articles.

1. New indications for endoscopic radiofrequency ablation;McCarty;Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol,2018

2. Endoscopic management of malignant biliary stricture;Dorrell;Diagnostics,2020

3. Thermal ablation versus repeated hepatic resection for recurrent intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma;Zhang;Ann Surg Oncol,2013

4. Intraductal radiofrequency ablation for management of malignant biliary obstruction;Rustagi;Dig Dis Sci,2014

5. Radiofrequency ablation for biliary malignancies;Mensah;Curr Opin Gastroenterol,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3